ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Identifying Contextual Workplace Stressors in a Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Building a resilient oncology workforce in the Asia-Pacific: From outcomes to systems thinking in workforce well-being.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
- Employee Perceptions of a Clinical Department's Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Workplace Stressors Associated With Burnout Among Emergency Nurses and Other Emergency Healthcare Professionals: A Convergent Parallel Approach With a Multilevel Design.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Healthcare professionals in plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) face unique stressors that contribute to burnout, increasing the risk of errors and compromising patient care. Despite this, there is limited research on PRS burnout in the United States. This study aimed to measure burnout rates and identify high-impact improvement targets within a PRS division at a US academic medical center. Methods: A sequential mixed-methods study was conducted, involving systems analysis and contextual design methods. All surgeons (n = 5) and nonsurgeons (n = 9) were invited to participate (total n = 14). Burnout rates were measured, and workplace stressors were identified using surveys, focus groups, and contextual inquiries. High-impact, low-effort improvement targets were determined through impact-effort matrices. Results: Survey data from 13 respondents revealed an 85% burnout rate. Three focus groups and 14 contextual inquiries were conducted. After 13 participants validated and prioritized 2 affinity diagrams and provided 24 high-priority stressors, 8 respondents completed 2 surveys that yielded 6 high-impact/low-effort targets for organizational improvement efforts. Conclusions: This study highlights the high prevalence of burnout in PRS and identifies specific improvement targets for both surgeons and nonsurgeons. Findings suggest strategies such as improving respect and recognition for surgeons and streamlining clinic flow for nonsurgeons. Implementing these targeted improvements can enhance the well-being of healthcare professionals and ultimately improve patient care. The study's methods can be replicated by other healthcare organizations to identify and address burnout-related issues effectively.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.