ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025
Supraclavicular lymph node metastasis in esophageal carcinoma: a topic of ongoing controversy.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nasopharyngeal carcinoma with inguinal lymph node metastasis: A case report.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Radical surgery versus definitive radiotherapy in treatment of locoregional upper esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Reassessing the prognostic value of station 108 in the era of neoadjuvant therapy.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025Article
- Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with non-regional cervical lymph node metastasis: a retrospective pilot study.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lymph node metastasis is an important prognostic factor in esophageal carcinoma (EC). Currently, there are no consensus-based staging methods for EC with supraclavicular lymph node (SCLN) metastasis. In this review, we present a summary of several classification methods of the SCLNs and highlight their differences in anatomic definitions. Then, we analyze the lymphatic drainage of the SCLNs from esophagus and the distribution patterns of the SCLNs metastasis from EC. Moreover, we discuss the prognostic influence and different staging methods of the SCLN metastasis. In summary, the variations in different classification methods make the SCLNs confusing for clinical application. A standardized and precise definition of the SCLNs should be established urgently for EC. SCLNs can drain lymphatics at various levels of the esophagus, even from the intramural esophagus directly. Therefore, the SCLNs can be metastatic in superficial EC and even become sentinel nodes. Metastatic SCLNs are usually located on the surface of the scalenus anterior muscle and near the venous angle. Increasing pieces of evidence have shown that patients with SCLN metastasis have similar survival than those with regional lymph node metastasis and better survival than those with organ metastasis, which bring challenges to current staging methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.