ArticleOpen access rheumatology : research and reviews2025
Role of Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography Scan in Reaching Definite Diagnosis in Patients With Fever of Unknown Origin and Inflammation of Unknown Origin in Rheumatology Outpatient Clinic.
Article in Open access rheumatology : research and reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients With Classic Fever of Unknown Origin: Prognostic Outcomes and Management Strategies.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Role ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Patients with fever of unknown origin (FUO) and/or inflammation of unknown origin (IUO) challenge clinicians in daily rheumatology practice. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) is being used in the diagnostic workup of patients with FUO and/or IUO. This study aims to evaluate the clinical utility and diagnostic performance of PET/CT in the rheumatology outpatient clinic among FUO and IUO patients. Methods: Patients admitted to Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşcıoğlu City Hospital Internal Medicine Rheumatology Outpatient Clinic between February 2022 and September 2023 with FUO and/or IUO and for whom PET/CT scan was performed were included. Initial acute phase reactants, PET/CT results, definite diagnosis and follow-up of patients without a definite diagnosis were retrospectively evaluated. Results: Thirty patients were included. Fifteen patients received a final diagnosis. Diagnoses were ankylosing spondylitis (n=4), rheumatoid arthritis (n=1), systemic lupus erythematosus (n=3), giant cell arteritis (n=1), adult onset Still disease (n=1), undifferentiated connective tissue disease (n=1), undifferentiated vasculitis (n=1) and crystal arthropathy (n=1), Hodgkin lymphoma (n=1) and cryptococcosis (n=1). PET/CT's diagnostic accuracy was 66.7%, sensitivity was 100% but specificity was 33%. In 15 patients a definite diagnosis was not reached but in most of these patients, fever did not recur and acute phase reactants regressed either spontaneously or with empiric treatment. Discussion: PET/CT reliably helps 50% FUO/IUO patients in receiving definite diagnosis. PET/CT's high sensitivity implies that negative results can reliably exclude malignancies in most cases. However, due to its low specificity, positive test may not always imply a serious underlying condition. Majority of the definite diagnoses were rheumatic diseases with a very low proportion of infections and malignancies. This is mainly due to the detailed initial evaluations that are performed in internal medicine clinics. Future studies with more patients will better define the role of PET/CT in FUO/IUO patients in rheumatology clinics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.