Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39931071›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2025

Effect of intercropping

Yao Ma, Bin Cao, Xiaojia Wang, Weijun Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yao MaSchool of Forestry and Pratacultural, Ningxia University, China.
Bin CaoSchool of Forestry and Pratacultural, Ningxia University, China.
Xiaojia WangSchool of Agriculture, NingXia Polytechnic, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China.
Weijun ChenLingwu Natural Resources Bureau, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cultivation of Lingwu jujube traditionally employs clean tillage, leaving substantial gaps between rows and exposing almost 60% of the orchard to the elements. This method promotes rapid soil moisture evaporation, exacerbates soil erosion, and deteriorates the soil's physicochemical properties. Consequently, there is a critical need for a more sustainable planting approach that optimally utilizes land resources. A pertinent question is whether varying densities of ryegrass intercropping can improve the uptake of nutrients and water by the jujube tree, the primary species in this ecosystem. In this context, a 2-year field experiment was conducted with three densities of perennial ryegrass intercropped with Lingwu jujube. The experiment assessed the impact on soil's physical and chemical attributes beneath the jujube canopy, with a focus on correlating soil moisture, enzyme activity, and physical properties. The findings reveal that intercropping at a medium density most effectively enhanced the soil's physical characteristics. Relative to monoculture, this approach increased the proportion of water-stable aggregates (0.5-0.25 mm) by 4.16%, decreased the soil's fractal dimension by 0.46%, augmented the field water holding capacity by 14.78%, and significantly boosted soil enzyme activity. Furthermore, high-density ryegrass intercropping elevated the soil's organic matter content by 36.09% and ameliorated both the pH and cation exchange capacity. Conversely, low-density intercropping raised soil moisture levels by 40.18% in the top 20 cm of the soil. Collectively, these results suggest that an optimal density of ryegrass in intercropping not only bolsters the moisture retention capabilities of soil in Lingwu jujube orchards but also enhances overall soil fertility. Therefore, the adoption of ryegrass and jujube tree intercropping is highly advisable in the ecologically sensitive and resource-constrained arid sandy regions of northern China, offering substantial practical benefits.

Indexed as

AgricultureLoliumSoilZiziphusWaterSoilWaterIntercropping‘Lingwu Changzao’Soil nutrientsWater-stable aggregates

Identifiers

PMID39931071
PMCPMC11809302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.