ArticleJournal of the science of food and agriculture2025
Porcine in vitro digestion and matrix structure of undigested residue of xylanase- and cellulase-supplemented maize and wheat.
Article in Journal of the science of food and agriculture, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study investigated the effects of supplementing maize and wheat with a combination of xylanase and cellulase on porcine in vitro digestibility, nonstarch polysaccharides (NSP) solubilization, and matrix structure. The latter was assessed using synchrotron-based micro-computed tomography (SR-μCT) and Fourier transform mid-infrared (FTMIR) spectroscopy after porcine in vitro degradation. Cereal grains were subjected to porcine in vitro digestion with or without enzyme supplementation (20 000 U kg
resultsIn vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDDM) was lower for maize than for wheat (P < 0.05), and enzyme supplementation had no effect on IVDDM. Supplemental enzymes reduced arabinoxylan content in the undigested residue of wheat (53 vs 46 g kg
conclusionSupplemental enzymes did not affect IVDDM for wheat, as they primarily degraded endosperm cell walls, the content of which was already released by pepsin and pancreatin digestion. Similarly, IVDDM for maize remained unaffected, which was probably due to the high phenolic content of its cell walls. © 2025 The Author(s). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.