Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39930916›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on sexual and reproductive health2025

The Role of Medication Abortion Provision in US States Without Total Abortion Bans, 2023.

Isabel DoCampo, Rachel K Jones, Isaac Maddow-Zimet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Isabel DoCampoGuttmacher Institute, New York, New York, USA.
Rachel K JonesGuttmacher Institute, New York, New York, USA.
Isaac Maddow-ZimetGuttmacher Institute, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

The impact of new state restrictions on abortion incidence and safety in the United StatesR61HD112921 · NICHD · GUTTMACHER INSTITUTE · PI SULLY, ELIZABETH ANNE · 2023 to 2023
$594k
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development, Office of Research on Women's Health, Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research R61HD112921NICHD NIH HHS R61 HD112921
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedication abortion has accounted for an increasing share of abortions in the United States (US) since the Food and Drug Administration's approval of mifepristone in 2000. This study offers updated estimates of medication abortions provided within the formal healthcare system in 2023 in US states without total abortion bans as well as a discussion of recent trends in medication abortion provision.

methodsThe Guttmacher Institute's Monthly Abortion Provision Study employs data from monthly samples of providers in a Bayesian hierarchical model to produce estimates of abortions provided within the formal healthcare system. We estimate the number and share of medication abortions provided in 2023 in states without total abortion bans and the share of abortions provided through telemedicine-only clinics.

resultsClinicians provided 648,500 medication abortions within the formal healthcare system in 2023 in states without total bans (90% uncertainty interval: 640,720-657,860), representing 63% of all abortions. Ten percent of all abortions were provided by telemedicine-only clinics. The number of medication abortions provided in US states without total abortion bans increased by 19% between 2019 and 2020, and by 32% between 2020 and 2023. DISCUSSION: Medication abortion plays a critical role in the US abortion access landscape. Medication abortion provision has accelerated since 2019, likely due to COVID-era policies that facilitated the expansion of telemedicine medication abortion provision. This shift has created essential access for individuals navigating abortion bans and other barriers to care since the removal of federal abortion protections.

Indexed as

Abortifacient AgentsAbortion, InducedAbortion, LegalBayes TheoremCOVID-19FemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMifepristonePregnancyTelemedicineUnited StatesAbortifacient AgentsMifepristone

Identifiers

PMID39930916
PMCPMC11936859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.