Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39930907›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology resources2025

The Long and the Short of It: Nanopore-Based eDNA Metabarcoding of Marine Vertebrates Works; Sensitivity and Species-Level Assignment Depend on Amplicon Lengths.

Karlijn Doorenspleet, Lara Jansen, Saskia Oosterbroek, Pauline Kamermans, Oscar Bos, Erik Wurz, Albertinka Murk, Reindert Nijland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Karlijn DoorenspleetMarine Animal Ecology Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8966-625X
Lara JansenMarine Animal Ecology Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Saskia OosterbroekMarine Animal Ecology Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Pauline KamermansMarine Animal Ecology Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Oscar BosWageningen Marine Research, Yerseke, the Netherlands.
Erik WurzMarine Animal Ecology Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Albertinka MurkMarine Animal Ecology Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Reindert NijlandMarine Animal Ecology Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0049-3768

Funding

European Regional Development Fund Interreg North Sea region GEANSRijksdienst voor Ondernemend Nederland TEWZ118017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To monitor the effect of nature restoration projects in North Sea ecosystems, accurate and intensive biodiversity assessments are vital. DNA-based techniques and especially environmental (e)DNA metabarcoding is becoming a powerful monitoring tool. However, current approaches rely on genetic target regions under 500 bp, offering limited taxonomic resolution. We developed a method for long-read eDNA metabarcoding, using Nanopore sequencing of a longer amplicon and present DECONA, a read processing pipeline to enable improved identification of marine vertebrate species. We designed a universal primer pair targeting a 2 kb region of fish mitochondrial DNA and compared it to the commonly used MiFish primer pair targeting a ~ 170 bp region. In silico testing showed that 2 kb fragments improved accurate identification of closely related species. Analysing eDNA from a North Sea aquarium showed that sequences from both primer pairs could be assigned to most species, and additional species level assignments could be made through the 2 kb primer pair. Interestingly, this difference was opposite in eDNA from the North Sea, where not the 2 kb but the MiFish primer pair detected more species. This study demonstrates the feasibility of using long-read metabarcoding for eDNA vertebrate biodiversity assessments. However, our findings suggests that longer fragments are less abundant in environmental settings, but not in aquarium settings, suggesting that longer fragments may provide a more recent snapshot of the community. Thus, long-read metabarcoding can expand the molecular toolbox for biodiversity assessments by improving species-level identification and may be especially useful when the temporal origin of the eDNA signal is better understood.

Indexed as

Aquatic OrganismsDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicDNA, EnvironmentalMetagenomicsNanopore SequencingVertebratesAnimalsBiodiversityDNA, MitochondrialDNA PrimersFishesNorth SeaSequence Analysis, DNADNA, EnvironmentalDNA, MitochondrialDNA PrimerseDNAfishlong readmetabarcodingnanoporeNorth Sea

Identifiers

PMID39930907
PMCPMC11969631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.