Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39930776›Full record

ArticleThoracic research and practice2025

Effects of Nasal and Oral Breathing on Respiratory Muscle and Brain Function: A Review

Ömer Bayrak, Massimiliano Polastri, Esra Pehlivan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Thoracic research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Microstructural Brain Correlates of Inter-individual Differences in Respiratory Interoception.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ömer BayrakDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Haliç University Faculty of Health Sciences, İstanbul, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0002-7352-9269
Massimiliano PolastriDepartment of Continuity of Care and Integration, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, ItalyORCID 0000-0001-8548-0813
Esra PehlivanDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, University of Health Sciences Türkiye, Faculty of Hamidiye Health Sciences, İstanbul, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0002-1791-5392

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nasal breathing (NB) and oral breathing (OB) are two modes of respiration, and the extent to which they affect respiratory muscles and brain function. The primary objective of this study was to explore the impact of NB versus OB on respiratory muscle and brain function. A literature review was conducted by searching the National Library of Medicine (PubMed) and Scopus databases from January 2000 and May 2024. One hundred twenty-six articles were retrieved from the databases searched, and at the end of the selection process, 11 articles were included in the present review. Most studies (91%) were experimental and had adult healthy volunteers; 64% of the included studies focused on the effects of NB and OB on brain function, while the remaining 36% focused on respiratory muscles. A total of 313 participants comprised the population, most of whom were women (63%). Although most studies were conducted on adults, a percentage of participants (15%) were children. NB and OB elicit different brain areas and heterogeneously influence respiratory muscle function. Knowledge of the underlying mechanisms could be beneficial for, for example, personalizing respiratory and manual techniques when rehabilitating individuals with neurological or respiratory impairments.

Indexed as

Brainbreathing modeelectroencephalographyelectromyographyrespiratory muscles

Identifiers

PMID39930776
PMCPMC12047190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.