ArticleAdvanced healthcare materials2025
Enhanced Bioprinting of 3D Corneal Stroma Patches with Reliability, Assessing Product Consistency and Quality through Optimized Electron Beam Sterilization.
Article in Advanced healthcare materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- High-yield cell-derived extracellular matrix bioink via macromolecular crowding for versatile 3D bioprinting.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Advanced Corneal Hydrogels: From Passive Replacement to Active Regeneration and Intelligent Interaction.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Progressive Insights into 3D Bioprinting for Corneal Tissue Restoration.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Enhanced Bioprinting of 3D Corneal Stroma Patches with Reliability, Assessing Product Consistency and Quality through Optimized Electron Beam Sterilization.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study focuses on the optimization of sterilization methods for bioprinted three-dimensional (3D) corneal stroma patches prepared using cornea-derived decellularized extracellular matrix (Co-dECM) hydrogels and human keratocytes, with the aim of enhancing clinical applications in corneal tissue engineering. An essential aspect of this study is to refine the sterilization processes, particularly focusing on electron beam (EB) sterilization, to maintain the structural and functional integrity of the Co-dECM hydrogels while ensuring sterility. The study reveals that EB sterilization outperformed traditional methods like ethylene oxide (EtO) gas and autoclaving, which tend to degrade the biochemical properties of hydrogels. By optimizing the EB-sterilization process, the essential mechanical and biochemical characteristics needed for successful 3D bioprinting are retained, reducing batch variability in bioprinted 3D corneal stroma patches. Consistency in production is vital for meeting regulatory standards and ensuring patient safety. Moreover, the study investigates the immunomodulatory properties of sterilized hydrogels, emphasizing their potential to minimize inflammatory responses, which is crucial for maintaining keratocyte phenotype. These findings significantly advance biomedical engineering by providing a sterilization method that preserves material integrity, minimizes immunogenicity, and supports the clinical translation of bioprinted corneal stroma patches, offering a promising alternative to donor transplants and synthetic substitutes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.