ArticleCancer science2025
Real-Time, AI-Guided Photodynamic Laparoscopy Enhances Detection in a Rabbit Model of Peritoneal Cancer Metastasis.
Article in Cancer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- New Concept of Intraoperative Fluorescence Diagnostics for Photodynamic Dosimetry of Tumors Using Chlorin-Based Photosensitizers.Biosensors · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Natural Photosensitizer-Based Nanopharmaceuticals in Photodynamic Therapy: Advanced Modeling, Data-Driven Optimization, and Translational Perspectives.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Roles of minimally invasive techniques in the management of epithelial ovarian cancer (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-assisted photodynamic diagnosis and photodynamic therapy against cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate diagnosis is essential for effective cancer treatment, particularly in peritoneal surface malignancies, where failure to detect metastatic lesions can mislead the treatment plan. This study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of staging laparoscopy using the integration of artificial intelligence (AI)-guided photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) with the photosensitizer Phonozen, activated at 405 nm in a rabbit model. To create peritoneal carcinomatosis, VX2 cells were inoculated laparoscopically into the peritoneum of female white New Zealand rabbits. Conventional and PDD-guided laparoscopy utilized a customized light source that emitted broad-spectrum white light or 405-nm blue light, respectively. The surgical procedure comprised a tripartite approach: exploration and labeling of suspected nodules under white-light visualization, identification of additional metastatic tumors under blue-excitation fluorescent light, and confirmatory open laparotomy to locate overlooked nodules by palpation. Our results showed that the initial experimental data from 371 nodules in 14 rabbits, comparing conventional diagnostic laparoscopy and PDD, showed increased detection sensitivity from 67% ± 1.9% (conventional) to 98% ± 0.7% (PDD) in the small-size nodule. In the second experimental data set from 265 nodules in 10 rabbits, the addition of a real-time AI algorithm further increased the sensitivity to 100% ± 0.0%. Combining PDD with AI enhances the detection of peritoneal cancer metastasis in staging laparoscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.