Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39930693›Full record

ArticleAnnals of transplantation2025

Retrospective Study to Compare Outcomes in 159 Patients Undergoing First Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Myeloma Treated with Melphalan 140 mg/m² or 200 mg/m².

Umut Yılmaz, Şükran Erdem Nurcan, Deniz Özmen, Ayşe Salihoğlu, Ahmet Emre Eşkazan, Şeniz Öngören, Zafer Başlar, Teoman Soysal, Muhlis Cem Ar, Tuğrul Elverdi

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Umut YılmazDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-8672-0679
Şükran Erdem NurcanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-1226-927X
Deniz ÖzmenDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-7561-446X
Ayşe SalihoğluDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ahmet Emre EşkazanDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Şeniz ÖngörenDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Zafer BaşlarDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Teoman SoysalDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-7417-2118
Muhlis Cem ArDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Tuğrul ElverdiDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND The standard conditioning regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in multiple myeloma (MM) is 200 mg/m² of melphalan (Mel200). Dosing is reduced by 30% (Mel140) in frail patients. Studies comparing the performance of these regimens report inconsistent findings, mainly confounded by non-consecutive patient inclusion, missing data, and heterogenous practices. The largest study reported an increased risk of death with Mel200 among patients with very good partial remission, or better, before ASCT. This retrospective study from a single center compared outcomes of patients with a first ASCT for myeloma treated with melphalan 140 mg/m² or 200 mg/m². MATERIAL AND METHODS This was a retrospective real-world analysis from a single center. Data from 159 consecutive, first, single ASCTs for MM between 2012 and 2021 were included. Mel200 and Mel140 were administered to 131 and 28 patients, respectively. Primary and secondary objectives were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), respectively. RESULTS Median follow-up was 5.8 years. Over 90% received bortezomib-based induction, and over 76% achieved at least very good partial remission (VGPR) before ASCT in either group. PFS estimates were similar between groups (P=0.49). OS was longer with Mel200 (HR=0.42, P=0.002). Mel200 maintained OS superiority in all relevant subgroups. CONCLUSIONS In a homogenous population of patients with MM, Mel200 was associated with longer OS, likely reflecting the physiological state of patients and tolerance to subsequent treatments. Concerns reported from EBMT data regarding the association of Mel200 with mortality among patients with VGPR or better before ASCT are not supported by this study's findings.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationMelphalanMultiple MyelomaMyeloablative AgonistsAdultAgedBortezomibDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInduction ChemotherapyMaleMiddle AgedProgression-Free SurvivalRetrospective StudiesBortezomibMelphalanMyeloablative Agonists

Identifiers

PMID39930693
PMCPMC11829485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.