ArticleThe American journal of case reports2025
Minimally Invasive Management of Infantile Dacryocystitis with Lacrimal Abscess: A Case Report.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Infantile acute dacryocystitis is due to congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) in newborns and infants, which involves acute bacterial infection of the lacrimal sac. This report describes a 37-day-old male infant with acute dacryocystitis and lacrimal abscess managed with a modified decompression and nasolacrimal duct probing. CASE REPORT We report the case of a 37-day-old male infant who presented with acute dacryocystitis complicated by a giant lacrimal abscess. On day 30 of life, his parent brought him to a local clinic due to inferior eyelid edema and hyperemia. He was diagnosed with acute dacryocystitis and was treated with tobramycin eye drops and ointment. However, severe erythema, swelling, and tenderness over the lacrimal sac area persisted. The parent refused a head CT, ultrasound examination, and systemic antibiotics, and brought the infant to our emergency unit for a second opinion on day 37 of life. A modified decompression and probing approach was employed, which involved gentle decompression of the abscess to relieve tension, followed by probing of the nasolacrimal duct to restore proper drainage. After a repeat decompression and probing procedure, the dacryocystitis and giant lacrimal abscess disappeared gradually, with good esthetic results. The infant responded well to the treatment, with resolution of symptoms and no recurrence of the abscess during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS This case demonstrates that our modified decompression and probing approach provides a practical and an alternate option to treat acute dacryocystitis in infants complicated by a giant lacrimal abscess.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.