Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39930653›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2025

Gamma Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Has Frequency-Dependent Effects on Human Motor Cortex Plasticity Induced by Theta-Burst Stimulation.

Wei-Yeh Liao, Brodie J Hand, John Cirillo, Ryoki Sasaki, George M Opie, Mitchell R Goldsworthy, John G Semmler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. [Research progress on combined transcranial electromagnetic stimulation in clinical application in brain diseases].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wei-Yeh LiaoDiscipline of Physiology, School of Biomedicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8912-9796
Brodie J HandDiscipline of Physiology, School of Biomedicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
John CirilloDiscipline of Physiology, School of Biomedicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Ryoki SasakiDiscipline of Physiology, School of Biomedicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2758-0722
George M OpieDiscipline of Physiology, School of Biomedicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Mitchell R GoldsworthyBehaviour-Brain-Body Research Centre, Justice and Society, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
John G SemmlerDiscipline of Physiology, School of Biomedicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0260-8047

Funding

Australian Research Council DE230100022Australian Research Council DP200101009Australian Research Council FT230100658Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 202060103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-term potentiation (LTP)-like plasticity in primary motor cortex (M1) induced by intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) can be enhanced by transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) at a gamma frequency of 70 Hz. Recent evidence suggests that there is some frequency specificity in the effects of tACS on motor function within the midgamma band (60-90 Hz). The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of different tACS frequencies within the gamma band on the neuroplastic response to iTBS. Seventeen healthy young adults performed four experimental sessions, where iTBS was combined with different tACS conditions (60, 75 and 90 Hz, sham) over M1 using a tACS-iTBS costimulation approach. Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) were assessed from a hand muscle before and after the intervention using transcranial magnetic stimulation with posterior-anterior (PA) and anterior-posterior (AP) coil orientations. Gamma tACS-iTBS costimulation increased PA and AP MEPs when gamma tACS was applied at 90 Hz, but not at 75 or 60 Hz, compared with sham tACS. PA and AP SICI was reduced by tACS-iTBS costimulation, but this was not influenced by gamma tACS frequency. Gamma tACS can increase LTP-like plasticity when combined with iTBS over M1, with the largest effect observed when tACS was applied at higher gamma frequencies. The functional relevance of targeting higher gamma frequencies within different brain areas and study populations remains to be determined.

Indexed as

Gamma RhythmMotor CortexNeuronal PlasticityTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAdultEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalTheta RhythmTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung Adultgammainhibitionmotor cortexplasticitytACSTMS

Identifiers

PMID39930653
PMCPMC11811485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.