Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39930597›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association2025

Summary of the clinical practice guideline for the management of urinary stones, third edition.

Katsuhito Miyazawa, Satoshi Yamaguchi, Taro Iguchi, Ippei Chikazawa, Takahiro Yasui, Satoru Takahashi, Shiro Hinotsu, Koichiro Akakura, Shizuka Iida, Noritaka Ishito and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Katsuhito MiyazawaDepartment of Urology, Kanazawa Medical University, Kahoku-gun, Ishikawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0331-3753
Satoshi YamaguchiThe Urinary Stone Medical Center, Kitasaito Hospital, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan.
Taro IguchiDepartment of Urology, Kanazawa Medical University, Kahoku-gun, Ishikawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7067-6642
Ippei ChikazawaDepartment of Urology, Kanazawa Medical University, Kahoku-gun, Ishikawa, Japan.
Takahiro YasuiDepartment of Nephro-urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2197-2477
Satoru TakahashiDepartment of Urology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Itabashi, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0819-9478
Shiro HinotsuBiostatistics and Data Management, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Koichiro AkakuraJCHO Mishima General Hospital, Mishima, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4368-1574
Shizuka IidaDivision of Urology, Iida Clinic, Omuta City, Fukuoka, Japan.
Noritaka IshitoThe Stone Center, Kurashiki Medical Center, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan.
Takaaki InoueHara Genitourinary Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8818-952X
Yasuo KohjimotoDepartment of Urology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Wakayama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6103-6320
Shinichi SakamotoDepartment of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Chiba, Japan.
Yoshikazu SatoDepartment of Urology, Sanjukai Urological Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2205-1357
Ryoji TakazawaTokyo Metropolitan Otsuka Hospital, Toshima-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1949-1754
Tatsuya TakayamaDepartment of Urology, International University of Health and Welfare Hospital, Nasushiobara, Tochigi, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3360-7688
Masao TsujihataDepartment of Urology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Sakai, Osaka, Japan.
Yukio NayaDepartment of Urology, Teikyo University Chiba Medical Center, Ichihara, Chiba, Japan.
Shuzo HamamotoDepartment of Nephro-urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9087-4152
Motoyuki MasaiMihama Hospital, Seijinkai Medical Corporation, Chiba, Chiba, Japan.
Takuro MasakiDepartment of Urology, Harasanshin Hospital, Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan.
Junichi MatsuzakiDepartment of Urology, Ohguchi Higashi General Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3950-1358
Soichi MugiyaHamamatsu Toyooka Hospital, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This third edition of the Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Urinary stones (2023) has been developed under the leadership of the Japanese Urological Association, the Japanese Society of Endourology and Robotics, and the Japanese Society on Urolithiasis Research. This revision adheres to the Minds Manual for Guideline Development (2017) and incorporates new findings from a nationwide survey conducted in 2015, which highlighted the epidemiological characteristics of urolithiasis in Japan since the previous guidelines were published in 2013. A significant advancement in this edition is the systematic review (SR) methodology applied to formulate recommendations for 12 clinical questions (CQs). Both quantitative and qualitative SRs were performed, leading to recommendations determined through consensus among 21 members of the guideline development group. Additionally, nine algorithms were created to support clinical decision-making based on these findings. Topics not addressed by the CQs, considered as foundational knowledge, are outlined in an "Explanation of Related Matters" section, which includes 26 items. This article provides an overview of these guidelines. This section ensures that practitioners have access to comprehensive information, covering aspects of urolithiasis management beyond the scope of the systematic reviews. This article provides an overview of the guidelines, emphasizing their relevance and importance in improving the management and treatment outcomes for patients with urinary stones. The guidelines are designed to be a practical resource for clinicians, facilitating evidence-based care in the evolving landscape of urolithiasis treatment.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicUrinary CalculiUrologyAlgorithmsClinical Decision-MakingHumansJapanSocieties, Medicaldiagnosisguidelinelithotripsyrecurrenceurinary stone

Identifiers

PMID39930597
PMCPMC12022745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.