Observational studyDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2025
Characterizing insulin dosing behaviour and glycaemic excursions: Development of metrics using connected insulin pen and continuous glucose monitoring.
Observational study in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03368807 (An Objective Assessment of Mealtime Bolus Insulin Behavior and Associated Factors), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Objective Assessment of Mealtime Bolus Insulin Behavior and Associated Factors
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Insulin pens and the digital ecosystem.Diabetologia · 2026Review
- Glucose360: An Open-Source Python Platform with Event-Based Integration for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Analysis.Diabetes technology & therapeutics · 2026Article
- Characterizing insulin dosing behaviour and glycaemic excursions: Development of metrics using connected insulin pen and continuous glucose monitoring.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsConnected insulin pens (CIPs) provide insulin dosing data that can be leveraged to drive improvements in glycaemic control. To realize this potential in routine care, insulin data need to be distilled into actionable insights for clinicians. We describe two algorithms for detecting glucose excursions using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data and then link excursions to CIP data to derive "insulin metrics" characterizing suboptimal bolus dosing practices. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis post hoc analysis used CGM and CIP data from a 12-week observational study (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03368807) of 64 adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes receiving multiple daily injection insulin therapy and glycated haemoglobin ≥8%. Two updated algorithms were applied to analyse glucose excursions associated with pre-meal boluses, missed bolus doses (MBDs), delayed boluses and correction boluses.
resultsGlycaemic metrics obtained using both algorithms were similar. Time in range (%TIR) was lower, and time above range (%TAR) and glycaemic variability (%GV) were higher, on days with MBDs. Compared with pre-meal boluses, delayed and correction boluses were followed by glucose excursions with larger change in glucose, longer duration with glucose >180 mg/dL, lower post-excursion %TIR and higher post-excursion %TAR; excursions following MBDs showed lower %TIR, higher %TAR and lower percent recovery. Glucose excursions were larger and longer when CGM was masked than when unmasked.
conclusionsThis analysis demonstrates "insulin metrics"-characterizations of insulin dosing behaviour derived from integrated CGM and CIP data-and provides a foundation for future work that will expand the understanding of an individual's insulin self-administration practices and improve clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.