Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39930537›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2025

Early fecal microbiota transplantation continuously improves chicken growth performance by inhibiting age-related Lactobacillus decline in jejunum.

Qiyao Liu, Muhammad Akhtar, Na Kong, Rumeng Zhang, Yue Liang, Yaqian Gu, Danyi Yang, Abdallah A Nafady, Deshi Shi, Abdur Rahman Ansari and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Qiyao Liu *Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, People's Republic of China.
Muhammad Akhtar *Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, People's Republic of China.
Na Kong *Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, People's Republic of China.
Rumeng ZhangKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, People's Republic of China.
Yue LiangKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, People's Republic of China.
Yaqian GuKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, People's Republic of China.
Danyi YangKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, People's Republic of China.
Abdallah A NafadyKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, People's Republic of China.
Deshi ShiDepartment of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, People's Republic of China.
Abdur Rahman AnsariSection of Anatomy and Histology, Department of Basic Sciences, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (CVAS) Jhang, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (UVAS), Lahore, Pakistan.
El-Sayed M Abdel-KafyAnimal Production Research Institute (APRI), Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Ministry of Agriculture, Giza, Egypt.
Syed Umair-Ali-Shah NaqviDepartment of Zoology, Govt. Islamia Graduate College, Civil Lines, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.
Huazhen LiuKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, People's Republic of China. lhz219@mail.hzau.edu.cn.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2017YFE0113700Supporting High Quality Development of Seed Industry Fund Project of Hubei Province HBZY2023B007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAt an early age, chickens commonly exhibit a rise in the average daily gain, which declines as they age. Further studies indicated that the decrease in chicken growth performance at a later age is closely associated with an age-related decline in Lactobacillus abundance in the small intestines. Whether inhibiting the age-related decline in Lactobacillus in the small intestine by early fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) could improve chicken growth performance is an interesting question.

results16S rRNA gene sequencing revealed a higher jejunal Lactobacillus abundance in high body weight chickens in both two different chicken breeds (yellow feather chickens, H vs L, 85.96% vs 55.58%; white feather chickens, H vs L, 76.21% vs 31.47%), which is significantly and positively associated with body and breast/leg muscle weights (P < 0.05). Moreover, the jejunal Lactobacillus abundance declined with age (30 days, 74.04%; 60 days, 50.80%; 120 days, 34.03%) and the average daily gain rose in early age and declined in later age (1 to 30 days, 5.78 g; 30 to 60 days, 9.86 g; 60 to 90 days, 7.70 g; 90 to 120 days, 3.20 g), indicating the age-related decline in jejunal Lactobacillus abundance is closely related to chicken growth performance. Transplanting fecal microbiota from healthy donor chickens with better growth performance and higher Lactobacillus abundance to 1-day-old chicks continuously improved chicken growth performance (Con vs FMT; 30 days, 288.45 g vs 314.15 g, P < 0.05; 60 days, 672.77 g vs 758.15 g, P < 0.01; 90 days, 1146.08 g vs 1404.43 g, P < 0.0001) even after stopping fecal microbiota transplantation at 4th week. Four-week FMT significantly inhibited age-related decline in jejunal Lactobacillus abundance (Con vs FMT, 30 days, 65.07% vs 85.68%, P < 0.01; 60 days, 38.87% vs 82.71%, P < 0.0001 and 90 days, 34.23% vs 60.86%, P < 0.01). Moreover, the numbers of goblet and Paneth cells were also found significantly higher in FMT groups at three time points (P < 0.05). Besides, FMT triggered GH/IGF-1 underlying signaling by significantly increasing the expressions of GH, GHR, and IGF-1 in the liver and IGF-1 and IGF-1R in muscles along age (P < 0.05).

conclusionThese findings revealed that age-related decline in jejunal Lactobacillus abundance compromised chicken growth performance, while early fecal microbiota transplantation continuously improved chicken growth performance by inhibiting age-related jejunal Lactobacillus decline, promoting the integrity of jejunal mucosal barrier and up-regulating the expression level of genes related to growth axis. Video Abstract.

Indexed as

ChickensFecal Microbiota TransplantationJejunumLactobacillusAge FactorsAnimalsBody WeightGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingGrowth HormoneInsulin-Like Growth Factor IMaleRNA, Ribosomal, 16SGrowth HormoneInsulin-Like Growth Factor IRNA, Ribosomal, 16SChickenFecal microbiota transplantationGrowth performanceJejunumLactobacillus

Identifiers

PMID39930537
PMCPMC11808950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.