ArticleBMC oral health2025
Patient safety attitude scale in dentistry: development and validation study in Türkiye.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient safety attitudes among dentists and clinical dental students: a multivariable cross-sectional analysis.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Patient safety and ethical attitudes among dentistry and dental assisting students: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis cross-sectional study aimed to develop a measurement tool to assess dental health workers' attitudes towards patient safety.
methodsThe candidate items for the questionnaire were developed and assessed for content validity by an expert panel. The reliability and validity of the Patient Safety Attitude Scale were examined by administering the finalized items to a sample of 312 dental healthcare professionals in Province Ankara. Participation was voluntary, and data were collected via the SurveyMonkey web platform. SPSS 26 and AMOS 24 were used for reliability and validity analysis.
resultsThe study found that most dental healthcare workers, with a mean age of 30.4 years and 74.4% female, reported moderate to high workloads, while only 7.1% had a light workload. Among them, 41% had received patient safety training, and 54.8% had witnessed a medical error. Factor analysis identified two factors: 'risk management' and 'ethical attitude,' together explaining 53.09% of the variance. The Cronbach's alpha value for the overall scale was 0.911, with 'risk management' (CA = 0.896) and 'ethical attitude' (CA = 0.692) demonstrating adequate internal consistency. A weak positive correlation was observed between patient safety attitudes and ethical knowledge, with higher safety scores among women and trained participants.
conclusionsThis study develops and validates a Patient Safety Attitude Scale in Dentistry Practices that can be used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.