Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39930477›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2025

A scoping review of the roles of stakeholders and coordination mechanisms for enhanced multi-sectoral and multi-level interventions in COVID-19 response in Nigeria.

Uchenna Ezenwaka, Chinyere Mbachu, Obinna Onwujekwe

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Uchenna EzenwakaHealth Policy Research Group, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria Enugu-Campus, Enugu, Nigeria. ezenwakauche@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6792-2814
Chinyere MbachuHealth Policy Research Group, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria Enugu-Campus, Enugu, Nigeria.
Obinna OnwujekweHealth Policy Research Group, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria Enugu-Campus, Enugu, Nigeria.

Funding

UK Aid 301132.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCollaboration among multiple stakeholders from different sectors requires a coherent coordination mechanism in implementing responses to public health emergencies such as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of countermeasures against the pandemic. The paper describes multi-stakeholder roles and the coordination mechanisms that were used at different levels of government in the COVID-19 response in Nigeria.

methodsA scoping review of documents on COVID-19 was undertaken between March 2021 and October 2022. Databases including Google Scholar, PubMed, Medline and Google were searched using "COVID-19", "Nigeria", "response" and "government" as the keywords. We included articles published from 30 January 2020 to 1 October 2022. The literature was extracted into Excel spreadsheets and analysed using the adapted WHO framework for multi-stakeholder preparedness coordination.

resultsA total of 173 documents were reviewed. The review revealed that various stakeholders (state and non-state actors) at national and sub-national levels played complementary roles in the implementation of different countermeasures to COVID-19 in Nigeria. The multi-sectoral response to COVID-19 in Nigeria was coordinated through the Presidential and State Task Force Teams. However, there were very weak linkages between and across different task forces. In addition, the expert and advisory committees at national and sub-national levels apparently functioned independently without lines of communication amongst them to encourage information sharing and learning. More so, the processes of coordination of different actors and their activities were fragmented and constrained by poor communication of policies among stakeholders, poor planning and contextualization of response strategies, lack of data for evidence-informed planning and lack of accountability.

conclusionsThe coordination of multi-stakeholders and multi-sectoral response to COVID-19 at national and sub-national levels in Nigeria was weak. A systematic coordination framework involving multiple stakeholders working at varying capacities is needed for effective and efficient response during pandemics such as COVID-19, to reduce duplication of efforts, inequitable resource allocation and wastage of resources and time. It is recommended that a future systematic coordination framework and guidelines involve multiple stakeholders, including the private and non-health public sectors, working at varying capacities and levels, to ensure an effective and efficient response during pandemics.

Indexed as

COVID-19Public HealthStakeholder ParticipationGovernmentHumansNigeriaPandemicsCoordinationCOVID-19 responseEfficiencyMulti-sectoralMulti-stakeholder collaborationNigeria

Identifiers

PMID39930477
PMCPMC11808979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.