Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39930396›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2025

Exploring prognostic precision: a nomogram approach for malignant pleural effusion in lung cancer.

Yongjie Jiang, Xin Hu, Yiluo Heibi, Hang Wu, Taibing Deng, Li Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yongjie Jiang *Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Xin Hu *Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Yiluo HeibiDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Guang'an People's Hospital, Guang'an, China.
Hang WuDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Taibing DengDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Guang'an People's Hospital, Guang'an, China.
Li JiangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China. lanqilily@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with lung cancer and malignant pleural effusion (MPE) often have poor prognoses. Accurate prognostic tools are needed to guide interventions and improve outcomes.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed clinical and imaging data from MPE patients at two medical centers. A nomogram was developed and externally validated. Clinical and imaging features were refined using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and independent predictors were identified via multivariate logistic regression. Predictors were integrated into the nomogram, whose predictive performance, calibration, and clinical utility were evaluated using statistical analyses, including receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, Hosmer-Lemeshow tests, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Survival curves illustrated prognostic differences among risk groups.

resultsThe final nomogram included five variables: Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) levels in pleural fluid, clarity of pleural effusion, treatment regimen, presence of pericardial effusion, and total volume of pleural effusion. In both cohorts, the nomogram demonstrated strong predictive accuracy (Area Under the Curve (AUC): 0.929 and 0.941, respectively) and excellent calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test p-values: 0.944 and 0.425, respectively). DCA confirmed the nomogram's clinical utility. Risk stratification revealed significant survival disparities among patients.

conclusionOur nomogram accurately predicts the prognosis of lung cancer patients with MPE at initial diagnosis, incorporating key variables such as LDH levels in pleural fluid, clarity of pleural effusion, treatment regimen, pericardial effusion, and total volume of pleural effusion. Its robust predictive performance, calibration, and clinical utility support its use in guiding clinical decision-making for this patient population.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsNomogramsPleural Effusion, MalignantAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansL-Lactate DehydrogenaseMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesROC CurveL-Lactate DehydrogenaseLung cancerMPENomogramPredictive modelingPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID39930396
PMCPMC11808993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.