Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39930389›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

A scoping review of photovoice for people living with diabetes.

Lichen Tang, Junyi Gu, Zheng Lin

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lichen TangJiangsu Province Hospital and Nanjing Medical University First Affiliated Hospital, No.300, Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, 210029, China.
Junyi GuHealth School attached to Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai, 200030, China.
Zheng LinJiangsu Province Hospital and Nanjing Medical University First Affiliated Hospital, No.300, Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, 210029, China. linzheng100@163.com.

Funding

Jiangsu Provincial Medical Innovation Team CXTDA2017019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe purpose of this review was to examine the characteristics of published photovoice method studies for people with diabetes, including the purposes, the methodological variations, and the main strengths and challenges during photovoice research.

methodsA scoping review was conducted with citations retrieved from the databases MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science. Studies published before 18 March 2023, when the search was conducted, were included.

resultsThirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Synthesizing all the included sources of evidence, study purposes fell into three domains: using photovoice in the context of a multi-component intervention(N = 2), examining the feasibility and effectiveness of modified photovoice method(N = 2), exploring the experiences and needs of diabetes or the issues related to diabetes self-management(N = 9). The photovoice method contributes to recording and reflecting on communities' strengths and concerns, facilitating critical dialogue. Only three studies discussed explicitly and documented its impact on reaching policymakers and social change.

conclusionThe photovoice method is a useful research approach for yielding vast visual information to identify divergences on which to focus and then generate policy recommendations and promote health behavior practices. However, substantial challenges remain in the implementation of photovoice research, which limits its practical benefits. Consistent reporting of the research steps and study findings, such as using a reporting flow diagram, is needed to help maintain order in the photovoice method.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusPhotographyHumansCommunity-based participatory researchDiabetesPhotovoiceScoping review

Identifiers

PMID39930389
PMCPMC11808938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.