Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39930378›Full record

Trial reportBMC gastroenterology2025

Pilot feasibility study to determine the utility of direct access and quantitative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in the assessment of suspected acute biliary or ductal gallstone presentations.

Alex Novak, Anita Acharya, Sally Beer, Alexis Espinosa, Giles Bond Smith, Cyrene Saga, Jane Andrews, Adam Bailey, Zahir Soonawalla, Helen Bungay and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03709030 (Determining the Utility of Direct Access Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03709030 nacompletednot on this map

Determining the Utility of Direct Access Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in the Assessment of Suspected Acute Gallstone Disease Presentations

TypeinterventionalSponsorPerspectumRan2019 to 2020Enrolled27ConditionsCholecystitis, Acute, CholedocholithiasisArmsmagnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alex NovakEmergency Medicine Research Oxford (EMROx), Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK. alex.novak@ouh.nhs.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5091-6768
Anita AcharyaOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation, Oxford, UK.
Sally BeerEmergency Medicine Research in Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Alexis EspinosaEmergency Medicine Research in Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Giles Bond SmithOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation, Oxford, UK.
Cyrene SagaOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation, Oxford, UK.
Jane AndrewsOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation, Oxford, UK.
Adam BaileyOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Zahir SoonawallaOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Helen BungayOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1016-3121
Michael PavlidesOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9882-8874

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with suspected acute gallstone disease typically undergo abdominal ultrasound. MRCP is often used for patients with abnormal LFTs, potentially making ultrasound unnecessary for this group. Despite high inter-reader variability in MRCP interpretation, new AI technologies may automate and standardize detection and measurement.

methodPatients with suspected acute gallstone disease and abnormal liver function tests were randomized into two diagnostic pathways, direct MRCP and standard care. Admission data, healthcare resource use, and clinical outcomes were recorded. National Health Service national 20/21 tariffs were used to calculate and compare healthcare costs. MRCP scans were subsequently analysed using MRCP + software (Perspectum Ltd).

results27 participants were enrolled over 12 months, 15 to direct MRCP and 11 to standard care. One patient was excluded from analysis. Mean patient time to diagnostic report and mean per patient associated direct medical cost and mean cost to diagnosis for the direct MRCP and standard of care group was 2.53 days, £449.54, and £647 respectively for the direct MRCP group and 4.18 days costing £742.06 and £896 for standard care. MRCP + analysis of 11 scans showed significant differences between the groups in terms of gallbladder volume (80.2mm

conclusionsDirect MRCP may be a feasible and potentially cost-effective diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected acute gallstone disease and deranged LFTs. Automated measurement of MRCP parameters shows promise in detecting obstruction. Larger trials are warranted to assess this potential. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03709030). Registration date: October 17, 2018.

Indexed as

Cholangiopancreatography, Magnetic ResonanceGallstonesAcute DiseaseAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFeasibility StudiesFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsAI-assisted imaging analysisDiagnostic pathwaysGallstone diseaseHealthcare costsMRCP (Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography)

Identifiers

PMID39930378
PMCPMC11809031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.