Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39930371›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Adaptation and validation of a condom-related stigma scale for older adults in China.

Wenwen Peng, Bei Wu, Jia Chen, Yan Shen, Qijian Deng, Xianhong Li

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wenwen PengXiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, 172 Tong Zi Po Road, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, China.
Bei WuRory Meyers College of Nursing, New York University, New York, US.
Jia ChenXiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, 172 Tong Zi Po Road, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, China.
Yan ShenXiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, 172 Tong Zi Po Road, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, China.
Qijian DengDepartment of Psychiatry, the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, China. dengqijian@csu.edu.cn.
Xianhong LiXiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, 172 Tong Zi Po Road, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, China. xianhong_li@csu.edu.cn.

Funding

the China Medical Board Open Competition Project 22-465the Hunan Ministry of Education Project 21B0006the National Natural Science Foundation of China 72074226
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCondom use has long been recommended as an effective method for preventing HIV/AIDS. However, a large proportion of older adults in China reported not using condoms, leading to an alarming increase in HIV prevalence among this population. Negative attitudes, especially condom-related stigma, have been identified as the main barrier. However, no condom-related stigma scale has been developed or validated for older adults in the Chinese cultural context. This study aimed to adapt and validate a condom-related stigma scale for older adults (CRSS-OA) in China, based on a scale previously developed for men who have sex with men (CRSS).

methodsBased on qualitative interviews, we adapted and revised the CRSS to better address the ageism and unique stigma faced by older adults in the Chinese cultural context. The reliability and validity of the adapted CRSS-OA were examined using a random sample of 498 older adults in Hunan Province, south-central China. Reliability was assessed by calculating Cronbach's alpha. Construct validity was assessed through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Concurrent validity was assessed by examining the correlation between each factor of the CRSS-OA and two criterion scales (the HIV/AIDS Stigma Scale and the Aging Sexual Attitudes Scale). Predictive validity was evaluated by analyzing the association between condom-related stigma and engagement in condomless sexual behavior.

resultsThe adapted scale included 16 items, loading on three factors, and collectively explaining 70.646% of the variance. These factors were named "labeling condom use," "shaming condom purchase," and "violating traditional sex beliefs," demonstrating strong internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha coefficients of 0.942, 0.850, and 0.852, respectively. Concurrent validity was established by evaluating the correlation between each factor of the CRSS-OA and two criterion scales, with Pearson correlation coefficients ranging from 0.227 to 0.508 (p < 0.05). Predictive validity was assessed by measuring the scale's ability to correctly predict condomless sexual behavior, with an average predictability of 0.77.

conclusionsThe adapted CRSS-OA has proven to be a valid and cultural-adaptive tool for assessing condom-related stigma among older adults in China. Further studies are needed to explore the external validity of this scale in the future.

Indexed as

CondomsSocial StigmaAgedChinaFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsQualitative ResearchReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesChinaCondom useOlder adultsScaleStigma

Identifiers

PMID39930371
PMCPMC11809071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.