Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39930359›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Validation of the Global Scales of Early Development (GSED) tool in rural Western Kenya.

Joshua Jeong, Juliet K McCann, Silas Onyango, Michael Ochieng

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joshua JeongHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. joshua.jeong@emory.edu.
Juliet K McCannHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Silas OnyangoAfrican Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya.
Michael OchiengB&M Consult, Nairobi, Kenya.

Funding

Engaging and Supporting Fathers: A Parenting Intervention to Improve Early Child Development in TanzaniaR00HD105984 · NICHD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI JEONG, JOSHUA · 2023 to 2025
$738k
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development R00HD105984NICHD NIH HHS R00 HD105984
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly childhood development (ECD) is a key determinant of long-term health, education, and wellbeing. However, one major global challenge is the lack of ECD assessment tools validated for use in low- and middle-income countries. To address this gap, the World Health Organization (WHO) launched in 2023 the Global Scales for Early Development, an open-access tool designed to generate reliable, valid, and internationally-comparable data on ECD for children aged 0-3 years globally. In this study, we examined the concurrent and convergent validity of the Global Scales for Early Development-long form (GSED-LF) for use with children aged 0-24 months in Kenya.

methodsWe analyzed baseline data collected in October-November 2023 as part of a cluster-randomized controlled trial evaluating a parenting program for improving ECD in rural Western Kenya. Primary caregivers (91% mothers) with a child under 24 months were enrolled across 64 villages in Busia and Homabay counties. The GSED-LF was administered to all children (N = 647). In a randomly selected sub-sample of children (N = 116), the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Bayley-III) and the Caregiver Reported Early Development Instruments (CREDI) were also administered to compare their scores with those from the GSED-LF. Concurrent validity of GSED-LF was assessed in terms of its correlations with Bayley-III and CREDI. Convergent validity of GSED-LF was examined with respect to parenting outcomes, including parental stimulation, home caregiving environment, and maternal mental health.

resultsGSED-LF scores had moderate associations with those on the Bayley and CREDI across the domains of cognitive, language, and motor development. GSED-LF had small associations with socioemotional development and relatively weaker concurrent validity for younger children under 12 months. GSED-LF also demonstrated good convergent validity in terms of showing moderate associations with maternal and paternal stimulation and the home caregiving environment.

conclusionsOverall, this study demonstrated the feasibility and initial validity of the GSED-LF as a direct assessment tool for use in rural Western Kenya. Additional psychometric analyses across diverse settings are needed to strengthen the reliability and validity evidence of the GSED-LF and establish it as a robust, globallyapplicable tool for assessing ECD in resource-limited settings.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentRural PopulationAdultChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornKenyaMalePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesEarly child developmentGlobal scales of Early DevelopmentKenyaMeasurementValidation

Identifiers

PMID39930359
PMCPMC11809019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.