ArticleBMC public health2025
Validation of the Global Scales of Early Development (GSED) tool in rural Western Kenya.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of the Moments that Matter parenting programme on caregiving practices, family violence, mental health and early child development in Kenya: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.BMJ global health · 2026Trial
- Validation of neurodevelopmental assessments for early detection of high-risk infants in Zimbabwe: protocol for the Child Development Observation study (ChiDO study).BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Article
- Effect of probable neonatal sepsis on the development of infants in Eastern Uganda (ENON): a cohort study.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Article
- Validation of the Global Scale for Early Development (GSED) for children 0 to 36 months of age in the Pacific: protocol.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEarly childhood development (ECD) is a key determinant of long-term health, education, and wellbeing. However, one major global challenge is the lack of ECD assessment tools validated for use in low- and middle-income countries. To address this gap, the World Health Organization (WHO) launched in 2023 the Global Scales for Early Development, an open-access tool designed to generate reliable, valid, and internationally-comparable data on ECD for children aged 0-3 years globally. In this study, we examined the concurrent and convergent validity of the Global Scales for Early Development-long form (GSED-LF) for use with children aged 0-24 months in Kenya.
methodsWe analyzed baseline data collected in October-November 2023 as part of a cluster-randomized controlled trial evaluating a parenting program for improving ECD in rural Western Kenya. Primary caregivers (91% mothers) with a child under 24 months were enrolled across 64 villages in Busia and Homabay counties. The GSED-LF was administered to all children (N = 647). In a randomly selected sub-sample of children (N = 116), the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Bayley-III) and the Caregiver Reported Early Development Instruments (CREDI) were also administered to compare their scores with those from the GSED-LF. Concurrent validity of GSED-LF was assessed in terms of its correlations with Bayley-III and CREDI. Convergent validity of GSED-LF was examined with respect to parenting outcomes, including parental stimulation, home caregiving environment, and maternal mental health.
resultsGSED-LF scores had moderate associations with those on the Bayley and CREDI across the domains of cognitive, language, and motor development. GSED-LF had small associations with socioemotional development and relatively weaker concurrent validity for younger children under 12 months. GSED-LF also demonstrated good convergent validity in terms of showing moderate associations with maternal and paternal stimulation and the home caregiving environment.
conclusionsOverall, this study demonstrated the feasibility and initial validity of the GSED-LF as a direct assessment tool for use in rural Western Kenya. Additional psychometric analyses across diverse settings are needed to strengthen the reliability and validity evidence of the GSED-LF and establish it as a robust, globallyapplicable tool for assessing ECD in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.