ArticleBMC cancer2025
Development of a deep learning system for predicting biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based tools in the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Pooled it
- Early Identification and Management of Biochemical Recurrence Following Radical Prostatectomy.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Review
- Machine learning-DeepSurv prediction model integrating mpMRI radiomics and genomic biomarkers for BCR-free survival and tumor response in prostate radiotherapy.Journal of radiation research · 2026Article
- Multimodal integration of pathomics and single-cell transcriptomics reveals CDC20 as a link between prostate cancer recurrence and benzo[a]pyrene-responsive phenotypes.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBiochemical recurrence (BCR) occurs in 20%-40% of men with prostate cancer (PCa) who undergo radical prostatectomy. Predicting which patients will experience BCR in advance helps in formulating more targeted prostatectomy procedures. However, current preoperative recurrence prediction mainly relies on the use of the Gleason grading system, which omits within-grade morphological patterns and subtle histopathological features, leaving a significant amount of prognostic potential unexplored.
methodsWe collected and selected a total of 1585 prostate biopsy images with tumor regions from 317 patients (5 Whole Slide Images per patient) to develop a deep learning system for predicting BCR of PCa before prostatectomy. The Inception_v3 neural network was employed to train and test models developed from patch-level images. The multiple instance learning method was used to extract whole slide image-level features. Finally, patient-level artificial intelligence models were developed by integrating deep learning -generated pathology features with several machine learning algorithms.
resultsThe BCR prediction system demonstrated great performance in the testing cohort (AUC = 0.911, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.840-0.982) and showed the potential to produce favorable clinical benefits according to Decision Curve Analyses. Increasing the number of WSIs for each patient improves the performance of the prediction system. Additionally, the study explores the correlation between deep learning -generated features and pathological findings, emphasizing the interpretative potential of artificial intelligence models in pathology.
conclusionsDeep learning system can use biopsy samples to predict the risk of BCR in PCa, thereby formulating targeted treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.