Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39930342›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2025

Development of a deep learning system for predicting biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer.

Lu Cao, Ruimin He, Ao Zhang, Lingmei Li, Wenfeng Cao, Ning Liu, Peisen Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lu CaoDepartment of Pathology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin, 300060, China.
Ruimin HeDepartment of Pathology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin, 300060, China.
Ao ZhangTianjin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin, 300222, China.
Lingmei LiDepartment of Pathology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin, 300060, China.
Wenfeng CaoDepartment of Pathology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin, 300060, China. caowenfeng2017@163.com.
Ning LiuDepartment of Pathology, Tianjin Baodi Hospital, Tianjin, 301899, China. cningning@sina.com.
Peisen ZhangTianjin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin, 300222, China. zpsbit@foxmail.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82002813National Natural Science Foundation of China 82202909Tianjin Health Technology Project TJWJ2021QN010Tianjin Key Medical Discipline (Pathology) Construction Project TJYXZDXK-012A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiochemical recurrence (BCR) occurs in 20%-40% of men with prostate cancer (PCa) who undergo radical prostatectomy. Predicting which patients will experience BCR in advance helps in formulating more targeted prostatectomy procedures. However, current preoperative recurrence prediction mainly relies on the use of the Gleason grading system, which omits within-grade morphological patterns and subtle histopathological features, leaving a significant amount of prognostic potential unexplored.

methodsWe collected and selected a total of 1585 prostate biopsy images with tumor regions from 317 patients (5 Whole Slide Images per patient) to develop a deep learning system for predicting BCR of PCa before prostatectomy. The Inception_v3 neural network was employed to train and test models developed from patch-level images. The multiple instance learning method was used to extract whole slide image-level features. Finally, patient-level artificial intelligence models were developed by integrating deep learning -generated pathology features with several machine learning algorithms.

resultsThe BCR prediction system demonstrated great performance in the testing cohort (AUC = 0.911, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.840-0.982) and showed the potential to produce favorable clinical benefits according to Decision Curve Analyses. Increasing the number of WSIs for each patient improves the performance of the prediction system. Additionally, the study explores the correlation between deep learning -generated features and pathological findings, emphasizing the interpretative potential of artificial intelligence models in pathology.

conclusionsDeep learning system can use biopsy samples to predict the risk of BCR in PCa, thereby formulating targeted treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Deep LearningNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProstatic NeoplasmsAgedBiopsyHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeural Networks, ComputerPrognosisProstatectomyProstate-Specific AntigenProstate-Specific AntigenBiochemical recurrenceDeep learningMulti instance learningProstate cancer biopsy

Identifiers

PMID39930342
PMCPMC11812243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.