ArticleJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2025
Impact of SGLT2 inhibitor on clinical and echocardiographic outcomes in patients with CRT during long-term period.
Article in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have improved the outcomes of patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, their effects in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) recipients are relatively scarce. This study has investigated the impact of SGLT2i treatment on clinical and echocardiographic outcomes in CRT patients at long-term follow-up.
methodsPatients with HF, New York Heart Association (NYHA) II-III class, and LVEF ≤ 35% referred for CRT implant were enrolled. Patients were grouped in non-SGLT2i (1st group) and SGLT2i treatment (2nd group) cohorts. Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes were evaluated at 24 months. Patients were classified as CRT responders if they remained alive without HF hospitalization, experienced an improvement of at least one NYHA class, and had left ventricular end-systolic volume reduction ≥ 15%.
resultsA total of 82 patients were enrolled. At 24-month follow-up, 22 of 41 (53.6%) patients in the 1st group and 32 of 41 (78.0%) in the 2nd group were classified as CRT responders (p = 0.019). In multivariable analysis, the left bundle branch block eligible to Strauss criteria (LBBB
conclusionThe SGLT2i treatment in CRT patients improves the combined CRT response at long-term follow-up. In our patient cohort, the CRT response is associated with LBBB
Indexed as
Identifiers
39930305What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.