ReviewAttention, perception & psychophysics2025
Getting a grip on visual search: Relating effort exertion to the control of attention.
Review in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Measuring the dynamics of attentional capture in hand and eye movements with virtual reality.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Causal reasoning guides visual exploration.Experimental brain research · 2026Article
- Signal suppression makes search less effortful.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026Article
- The Attention Habit II: How selection history shapes the strategic control of attention.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2025Review
- Easy does it: Selection during interactive search tasks is biased towards objects that can be examined easily.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Humans are generally biased to conserve energy, limiting the exertion of physical and mental effort. The need for attention to selectively process perceptual information is a ubiquitous part of mental life, but how mentally effortful is the process of finding the target of a visual search, and how much mental effort is required to focus attention in the face of potentially distracting stimuli? Does learning from demands on physical effort shape the control of attention, much like rewards and punishments? In this tutorial review, we provide an overview of a novel approach to probing the mental effort involved in visual search and the control of attention more generally. Situations are created in which exerting physical effort, via a hand dynamometer, can modify the demands of a visual search task. More specifically, participants can exert physical effort to reduce the putative mental effort required to find a target. When comparing across search conditions, this approach can reveal the conditions that participants are willing to physically work to achieve, with implications for the mental effort associated with these conditions. We also introduce a reciprocal approach in which demands on physical effort, and their association with the visual search task, are manipulated, providing an opportunity to examine how the control of attention is shaped by these effort demands. Some practical considerations for the implementation of these novel approaches are discussed, as are potential new research directions for which these approaches are well suited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39930294What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.