ArticleUpdates in surgery2026
The effectiveness of two-step percutaneous transhepatic choledochoscopic lithotripsy for hepatolithiasis: a retrospective study.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Percutaneous transhepatic choledochoscopic lithotripsy for bile duct stones in elderly patients: a case report and technical summary.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The study was designed to compare the effectiveness of two-step percutaneous transhepatic choledochoscopic lithotripsy (T-PTCSL) with laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy combined with choledocholithotomy (LAHC) for patients with hepatolithiasis. From January 2020 to September 2023, 98 patients who underwent LAHC (n = 40) or T-PTCSL (n = 58) for hepatolithiasis in our hospital were included in this study. Their perioperative and long-term outcomes were analyzed. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in stone clearance rates (90.0% vs. 84.5%, P = 0.429) and postoperative complication rates (35.0% vs. 22.4%, P = 0.170). The T-PTCSL group had significantly shorter operative time, postoperative hospitalization, and intake time (all P < 0.001). Postoperative biochemical indices showed lower ALB, ALT, AST, and WBC in the T-PTCSL group compared to the LAHC group (all P < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression indicated age as an independent risk factor for stone clearance (OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.89-0.99, P = 0.049). Subgroup analysis showed no significant impact of gender and type of stone distribution on stone clearance (all P > 0.05). The KM curve analysis revealed no significant difference in stone recurrence between the groups (log-rank P = 0.925). Hemoglobin concentration was significantly associated with time-to-stone recurrence (TR = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.01-1.04, P < 0.05) in the multivariate Accelerated Failure Time Model. T-PTCSL may be an alternative option to LAHC. Compared with LAHC, T-PTCSL offers favorable postoperative recovery and less surgical injury for patients with hepatolithiasis, as well as equivalent effectiveness of stone clearance and recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39930257What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.