ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2025
Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Matching of Human Postmortem Donors to Ocular Research Projects.
Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Agentic Artificial Intelligence in Eye Banking: A Proposed Workflow.Eye banking and corneal transplantation · 2026Article
- Transforming Biobanking with AI: Perspectives from Leading Experts.Biopreservation and biobanking · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The scarcity of human ocular samples with short postmortem intervals (PMIs) is a significant issue in ophthalmic research and drug discovery. A contributing factor is that eye banks must manually match donor data to prospective research project criteria, which is time-consuming, inefficient, and error-prone. We have previously reported on the successful use of a semi-automated matching system, ReSync. The barrier to full autonomy is that donor medical data is often provided as unstructured data in free text fields, which prevents interoperability with matching databases. Herein, we report on a small retrospective study, in which artificial intelligence (AI) is incorporated into ReSync (ReSyncAI) to test AI's ability to structure donor data for subsequent matching. From a set of historical cases, medical data was securely sent to a large language model with natural language processing. After structuring and standardizing, data was returned to ReSync for analysis and match testing. A 94.2% success rate in medical terminology keyword extraction in concert with correcting and standardizing medical data was achieved. Structured data was fully interoperable with ReSync. In a subset of cases, ReSyncAI properly matched donors to the standardized term of "age-related macular degeneration" from donor data, including instances of abbreviations, misspellings, and incomplete designations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39930245What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.