Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39930158›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2025

Language Concordance and Interpreter Use for Spanish-Preferring Patients: Qualitative Study of Perspectives from Primary Care Providers.

Denise D Quigley, Nabeel Qureshi, Efrain Talamantes, Zachary Predmore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Denise D QuigleyRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA. quigley@rand.org.ORCID 0000-0002-3815-908X
Nabeel QureshiRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Efrain TalamantesAltaMed Health Services Corporation, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Zachary PredmoreRAND, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

AHRQ HHS U18 HS029321AHRQ HHS U18HS029321
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoor quality communication and language barriers lead to worse care experiences and inferior health care outcomes for those with limited English proficiency. Fewer than one-third of outpatient providers regularly use professional interpreters when communicating with non-English preferring patients. Effective strategies to address language barriers in primary care are lacking and in demand.

objectiveExamine provider perspectives on providing in-person care to Spanish-preferring patients.

designPartnered with a large, urban Federally Qualified Health Center predominantly caring for Spanish-preferring Hispanic patients, we identified primary care providers who (1) were language-concordant (provider and patient speak same language); (2) used qualified interpreters; and (3) used informal strategies for interpretation/communication.

participantsWe interviewed 24 providers (10 language-concordant, 9 who used qualified interpreters, 5 who used informal interpreters and other strategies; response-rate 23%). APPROACH: We established codes using systematic, inductive procedures to generate insights from responses and identified themes using content analysis.

resultsProviders-both language-concordant and those using interpreters-preferred to speak the same language as the patient, employed varying communication strategies, and required more time to care for Spanish-preferring patients for differing reasons. Using interpreters did not always improve communication because using qualified interpreters requires more time for initiating interpretation, connectivity issues, and conducting consecutive interpretation; using any interpreter requires provider-interpreter clarification or staff to translate, and sometimes interpreters had difficulty with medical content/terminology. Provider-patient visits also qualitatively differed based on language spoken and interpreter use in eliciting concerns, topics covered, patient comprehension, and time spent on rapport-building and patient education.

conclusionsProviders described barriers that organizations need to address to facilitate effective communication and language interpretation when caring for Spanish-preferring patients. Research is needed that identifies and tests language support strategies for providers and clinics and structural changes that preserve time during patient visits for providers and patients to spend on health care needs.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCommunication BarriersHispanic or LatinoLanguagePatient PreferencePrimary Health CareTranslatingAdultFemaleHumansLimited English ProficiencyMaleMiddle AgedPhysician-Patient RelationsQualitative ResearchWhiteinterpreter uselanguage concordancepatient experienceprimary care providersquality of carespanish-preferring patients

Identifiers

PMID39930158
PMCPMC12405146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.