Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39930149›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2025

Pseudo acute kidney injury in patients receiving CDK4/6 inhibitors.

Sanne M Buijs, Elisabeth M Jongbloed, Lotte E M van Bergen, Christian R B Ramakers, Stijn L W Koolen, Ron H J Mathijssen, Michiel G H Betjes, Agnes Jager

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sanne M Buijs *Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. s.buijs@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0548-1803
Elisabeth M Jongbloed *Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Lotte E M van BergenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Christian R B RamakersDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Stijn L W KoolenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Ron H J MathijssenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5667-5697
Michiel G H BetjesDepartment of Nephrology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Agnes JagerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7713-1450

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) improve progression-free survival in patients with advanced oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer. However, all CDK4/6i may increase creatinine levels, which can indicate kidney injury. In vitro research has shown that CDK4/6i can also inhibit tubular secretion of creatinine, thereby causing the phenomenon 'pseudo-acute kidney injury (pseudo-AKI)'. The incidence of pseudo-AKI is, however, unknown. We aimed to determine this incidence by assessing cystatin C, a protein filtered in the glomerulus without being subject to tubular secretion, in patients with creatinine increase during CDK4/6i treatment.

methodsIn this retrospective single-centre cohort study patients with breast cancer who received CDK4/6 inhibitors between January 1st 2017 and December 29th 2023 were screened for the incidence of creatinine increases suggesting potential kidney injury in the first six months of treatment. A significant creatinine increase was defined as 1) a creatinine plasma level of >90 µmol/L in women or >115 µmol/L in men and >10% increase from baseline creatinine plasma level or 2) a creatinine plasma level >1.5 times baseline creatinine or 3) an increase in creatinine plasma level from baseline with >26 µmol/L. Pseudo-AKI was diagnosed if the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using cystatin C at the moment of creatinine increase was 1) equal or higher than eGFR using creatinine at baseline and/or 2) at least 25% higher than eGFR using creatinine at the moment of creatinine increase. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with pseudo-AKI analysed by means of the binomial probability test.

resultsOf the 234 patients treated with a CDK4/6i, 41 (17.5%) had creatinine levels indicating an AKI. From 22 of these 41 patients, cystatin C could be determined in retrospectively available serum. Pseudo-AKI was found in 16 out of 22 patients (73%, 95% CI 50-89%). In 5 out of 41 patients (12%) the CDK4/6i dose was unjustly adjusted or the drug was stopped due to creatinine increase.

conclusionPseudo-AKI has a high incidence in patients treated with CDK4/6i. Determining an eGFR based on the cystatin C value should therefore be considered as the first step when creatinine increases during CDK4/6i treatment.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryBreast NeoplasmsCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6Protein Kinase InhibitorsAdultAgedCreatinineCystatin CFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesCDK4 protein, humanCDK6 protein, humanCreatinineCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6Cystatin CProtein Kinase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID39930149
PMCPMC11920040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.