ArticleCommunications biology2025
A deep learning-based system for automatic detection of emesis with high accuracy in Suncus murinus.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using AI Algorithms and Machine Learning in the Analysis of a Bio-Purification Method (Therapeutic Emesis, Known as "Vamana Karma"): Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Review
- Sensory signals for nausea.Trends in neurosciences · 2025Review
- A deep learning-based system for automatic detection of emesis with high accuracy in Suncus murinus.Communications biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantifying emesis in Suncus murinus (S. murinus) has traditionally relied on direct observation or reviewing recorded behaviour, which are laborious, time-consuming processes that are susceptible to operator error. With rapid advancements in deep learning, automated animal behaviour quantification tools with high accuracy have emerged. In this study, we pioneere the use of both three-dimensional convolutional neural networks and self-attention mechanisms to develop the Automatic Emesis Detection (AED) tool for the quantification of emesis in S. murinus, achieving an overall accuracy of 98.92%. Specifically, we use motion-induced emesis videos as training datasets, with validation results demonstrating an accuracy of 99.42% for motion-induced emesis. In our model generalisation and application studies, we assess the AED tool using various emetics, including resiniferatoxin, nicotine, copper sulphate, naloxone, U46619, cyclophosphamide, exendin-4, and cisplatin. The prediction accuracies for these emetics are 97.10%, 100%, 100%, 97.10%, 98.97%, 96.93%, 98.91%, and 98.41%, respectively. In conclusion, employing deep learning-based automatic analysis improves efficiency and accuracy and mitigates human bias and errors. Our study provides valuable insights into the development of deep learning neural network models aimed at automating the analysis of various behaviours in S. murinus, with potential applications in preclinical research and drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.