ArticleScientific reports2025
IVC treatment between primary and second TURBT may improve the prognosis of high-risk NMIBC patients receiving BCG treatment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To explore whether intravesical chemotherapy (IVC) between primary and second transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) affects the prognosis of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients receiving Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) treatment. NMIBC patients who underwent a second TURBT and subsequent BCG treatment between 2012 and 2023 at the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University were retrospectively analyzed. These patients were divided into Group A, which received IVC between TURBT, and Group B, which did not. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was compared among the different risk subgroups. A total of 292 NMIBC patients were included in this study. In the entire cohort, IVC treatment between the primary and second TURBT was associated with longer RFS (P = 0.009). When stratified by risk groups, in intermediate-risk patients, the difference in RFS between the groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.434). By contrast, for high-risk patients, the treated group exhibited a better prognosis compared to the non-treated group (85.6% vs. 77.6%, P = 0.007). In both univariate and multivariate COX regression analyses, after adjusting for clinical factors such as tumor stage and tumor grade, the IVC between the primary and second TURBT remained an independent prognostic factor for NMIBC patients (HR 0.571, 95% CI [0.380, 0.859], p = 0.007). IVC treatment administered between the primary and second TURBT has been demonstrated to enhance RFS of high-risk NMIBC patients undergoing BCG treatment, whereas it is not applicable to intermediate-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.