ArticleCommunications chemistry2025
An active representation learning method for reaction yield prediction with small-scale data.
Article in Communications chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Yield Smarter, Not Harder: Good Practices for Machine Learning of Reaction Outcomes.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- An artificial intelligence-driven synthesis planning platform (PhotoCat) for photocatalysis.Communications chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reaction optimization plays an essential role in chemical research and industrial production. To explore a large reaction system, a practical issue is how to reduce the heavy experimental load for finding the high-yield conditions. In this paper, we present an efficient machine learning tool called "RS-Coreset", where the key idea is to take advantage of deep representation learning techniques to guide an interactive procedure for representing the full reaction space. Our proposed tool only uses small-scale data, say 2.5% to 5% of the instances, to predict the yields of the reaction space. We validate the performance on three public datasets and achieve state-of-the-art results. Moreover, we apply this tool to assist the realistic exploration of the Lewis base-boryl radicals enabled dechlorinative coupling reactions in our lab. The tool can help us to effectively predict the yields and even discover several feasible reaction combinations that were overlooked in previous articles.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.