ArticleScientific reports2025
Standalone ultrasound-based highly visualized volumetric spine imaging for surgical navigation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Statistical shape modeling and Gaussian process-based reconstruction of the lumbar spine from partial data: a proof-of-concept study.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- Review
- Spinal Cord Injury in Real Time: Intra-Operative Ultrasound for Acute Phase Examination in Non-Human Primates.Brain sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current navigation systems employing intraoperative CT have been applied in spinal interventions for accurate and visualized guidance. The consequential issue of radiation doses and surgical workflow disruption spotlighted ultrasound (US) as an alternative imaging modality. However, the challenge of anatomy interpretation left US-based navigation inadequate in visualization, resulting in the necessity of registration of preoperative images. Here we report a standalone ultrasound image-guided system (SUIGS) leveraging a purpose-made network to automatically extract bone features and reconstruct them into highly visualized volumetric images for spinal navigation. We showed the SUIGS highly visualized the bone markers with an imaging accuracy of 1.19 ± 0.85 mm in scanning tests on human volunteers. Through extensive testing on data from hospitalized patients containing atypical cases (spinal deformity, obesity), we confirmed that SUIGS generalizes across different individuals with a 100% success rate in aligning with preoperative CT. Furthermore, SUIGS yielded comparable results to three-dimensional fluoroscopy guidance in intraoperative intraspinal tumor localization and reduced the procedure to 8 min. This study explored and broadened the clinical application of standalone US navigation by providing intraoperative high-visualized volumetric spinal imaging, which is expected to increase the likelihood of surgeons adopting it in practice to reduce the occurrence of wrong-site surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.