Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39929966›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Time perception in cerebellar and basal ganglia stroke patients.

Annibale Antonioni, Emanuela Maria Raho, Mariagrazia Capizzi, Andrea Gozzi, Pietro Antenucci, Enrico Casadei, Zaira Romeo, Antonino Visalli, Daniela Gragnaniello, Giovanna Mioni and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Combined repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and mirror therapy for upper limb rehabilitation in stroke survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Hypnotizability and Time Reproduction.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Annibale Antonioni *Doctoral Program in Translational Neurosciences and Neurotechnologies, Department of Neurosciences and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, 44121, Italy. annibale.antonioni@edu.unife.it.
Emanuela Maria Raho *University Unit of Neurology, Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, 44121, Italy.
Mariagrazia CapizziMind, Brain and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Andrea GozziUniversity Unit of Neurology, Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, 44121, Italy.
Pietro AntenucciUniversity Unit of Neurology, Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, 44121, Italy.
Enrico CasadeiTraining Course in General Medicine, AUSL Romagna, Ravenna, 48121, Italy.
Zaira RomeoNeuroscience Institute, National Research Council, Padua, 35128, Italy.
Antonino VisalliDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padua, 35131, Italy.
Daniela GragnanielloNeurology Unit, Interdistrict Health Care Department of Neurosciences, S. Anna Ferrara University Hospital, Ferrara, 44124, Italy.
Giovanna MioniDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padua, 35131, Italy.
Maura PugliattiUniversity Unit of Neurology, Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, 44121, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neural mechanisms underlying time perception remain elusive. Although the cerebellum (CE) and basal ganglia (BG) are considered fundamental, evidence primarily stems from studies on neurodegenerative diseases, where progressive and widespread damage complicates linking deficits to specific brain structures. In contrast, brain stroke affects focal areas suddenly, allowing for the assessment of immediate functional consequences. Here, we compared patients with acute stroke in the CE and BG to age-matched healthy controls (HC) on both explicit (time bisection, free and 1-second finger tapping) and implicit (rhythmic, temporal orienting) timing tasks. Concerning explicit timing, both CE and BG patients were faster than HC in their free finger tapping, while BG lesions showed greater variability than HC in the 1-second tapping. Similarly, performance on the bisection task suggested deficits more related to cognitive complaints in stroke than specific temporal dysfunction. In implicit timing tasks, BG patients, like HC, effectively used information provided by the rhythm and the temporal orienting cues to anticipate the target onset, whereas CE patients failed and showed longer reaction times. Therefore, before compensatory mechanisms can take effect, acute CE damage might hinder implicit timing, whereas BG lesions could disrupt explicit temporal representation when processed alongside other cognitive functions.

Indexed as

Basal GangliaCerebellumStrokeTime PerceptionAgedCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReaction TimeBasal gangliaCerebellumExplicit timingImplicit timingStrokeTime

Identifiers

PMID39929966
PMCPMC11811137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.