Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39929952›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Model sensitivity limits attribution of greenhouse gas emissions to polar bear demographic rates.

Ryan R Wilson, Erik M Andersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ryan R WilsonU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Marine Mammals Management, Anchorage, AK, USA. ryan_r_wilson@fws.gov.
Erik M AndersenU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Marine Mammals Management, Anchorage, AK, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Greenhouse gas emissions continue to increase and negatively affect sea ice conditions that polar bears rely on. It is therefore important to better understand how specific emissions levels affect polar bear demography. A recent study proposed a framework to address this issue, but sensitivity to decisions rules of the approach may limit its utility. We tested how sensitive the approach is to decisions rules related to sea ice concentration, choice of subpopulation boundaries, and modeling choices for bears in the Chukchi Sea and Southern Beaufort Sea subpopulations. We found that the number of ice-free days, number of fasting days, and when 10% of reproductive females exhibited recruitment failure varied considerably depending on equally-valid decisions rules versus those used in the existing study. Whereas the previous study suggested that both subpopulations surpassed the critical number of ice-free days that negatively affect recruitment, we found this threshold was never reached by the Southern Beaufort Sea subpopulation and only once for the Chukchi Sea subpopulation for the decision rules we considered. Our results suggest that the previously published approach is too sensitive to modeling assumptions and choice of decision rules to accurately evaluate the impacts of GHG emissions on polar bear demographic rates.

Indexed as

Greenhouse GasesModels, TheoreticalUrsidaeAnimalsFemaleIce CoverGreenhouse GasesClimate attributionClimate changeEndangered species actGreenhouse gas emissionsPolar bearsUrsus maritimus

Identifiers

PMID39929952
PMCPMC11811060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.