ArticleScientific reports2025
Advanced and hybrid machine learning techniques for predicting compressive strength in palm oil fuel ash-modified concrete with SHAP analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Hybrid machine learning approach for predicting compressive strength of sustainable concrete incorporating palm oil fuel ash.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A hybrid machine learning approach for predicting the flexural strength of concrete reinforced with waste aluminium fibres.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Performance optimization of rigid pavement concrete using metakaolin treated RCA and silica fume with an experimental and machine learning based approach.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Machine learning models with SHAP for performance prediction of eco-friendly fiber reinforced mortars with glass waste.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Evaluating the mechanical behavior of plastic waste modified asphalt using optimized machine learning approaches.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing demand for sustainable construction materials has led to the incorporation of Palm Oil Fuel Ash (POFA) into concrete to reduce cement consumption and lower CO₂ emissions. However, predicting the compressive strength (CS) of POFA-based concrete remains challenging due to the variability of input factors. This study addresses this issue by applying advanced machine learning models to forecast the CS of POFA-incorporated concrete. A dataset of 407 samples was collected, including six input parameters: cement content, POFA dosage, water-to-binder ratio, aggregate ratio, superplasticizer content, and curing age. The dataset was divided into 70% for training and 30% for testing. The models evaluated include Hybrid XGB-LGBM, ANN, Bagging, LSSVM, GEP, XGB and LGBM. The performance of these models was assessed using key metrics, the coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), normalized root means square error (NRMSE), mean absolute error (MAE) and Willmott index (d). The Hybrid XGB-LGBM model achieved the maximum R2 of 0.976 and the lowest RMSE, demonstrating superior accuracy, followed by the ANN model with an R2 of 0.968. SHAP analysis further validated the models by identifying the most impactful input factors, with the water-to-binder ratio emerging as the most influential. These predictive models offer the construction industry a reliable framework for evaluating POFA concrete, reducing the need for extensive experimental testing, and promoting the development of more eco-friendly, cost-effective building materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.