ArticleScientific reports2025
A prediction model of soil organic carbon into river and its driving mechanism in red soil region.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Soil erosion contributes to the irreversible loss of soil organic carbon (SOC) into rivers (SOCR), posing risks to food security and carbon cycle assessments. Red soil regions, characterized by high carbon sink potential and selenium enrichment, are particularly vulnerable. However, existing studies largely rely on small-scale experiments, with limited understanding of basin-scale SOCR dynamics and their driving factors. This study integrates the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) for sediment yield simulation and a Soil Organic Carbon Content (SOCC) model to quantify SOCR at the basin scale. A Random Forest-based prediction model was developed to explore the spatial-temporal variability and driving mechanisms of SOCR in the Dongjiang River Basin (DRB), a representative red soil region in southern China. Results indicate significant spatial-temporal heterogeneity, with higher SOCR observed in downstream, human-disturbed areas during flood seasons. The model demonstrates excellent performance (R²>0.9). Key drivers of SOCR variability include sediment yield, cultivated land area (CULT), and urban land area (TOWN), with urbanization showing stronger sensitivity than cultivation due to factors such as city size and impervious surfaces. The proposed framework reveals the dynamic change characteristics of SOCR and its driving mechanism, which has the potential to be generalized to other basins with similar studies, and provides a technical support for land resource management and carbon cycling in the erosion-prone red soil region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.