Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39929935›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Identifying modifiable factors that influence walking in patients undergoing surgery for neurogenic claudication: a prospective longitudinal study.

Suzanne McIlroy, Lindsay Bearne, John Weinman, Sam Norton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Minimal clinically important difference of the 6-Minute walk test and daily step count at 3 months following surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Suzanne McIlroyPhysiotherapy Department, King's College Hospital, London, UK. Suzanne.mcilroy@nhs.net.
Lindsay BearnePopulation Health Research Institute, City St George's, University of London, London, UK.
John WeinmanSchool of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Science, King's College London, London, UK.
Sam NortonHealth Psychology Section, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurogenic claudication, caused by lumbar spinal stenosis, is the most common reason for spinal surgery in older adults, aiming to improve pain and walking. However, most people do not increase walking post-operatively. This study aimed to identify modifiable physical and psychosocial factors that could be targeted with rehabilitation. A prospective longitudinal study recruited 97 adults, aged > 50 years, awaiting surgery for neurogenic claudication. Walking measures (six-minute walk test, daily step count, self-rated maximum walking distance) were assessed pre-surgery and 12-weeks post-surgery. Modifiable variables, mapped to a behaviour change model (COM-B; e.g. falls, lower limb performance, fear of movement, illness perceptions), were evaluated using mixed-effects regression models. All walking measures demonstrated statistically significant improvements (p < .001). However, 50% did not achieve minimum clinically important differences. The strongest correlation with post-operative walking was pre-operative walking. Cross-sectionally, lower limb performance (b:.75; 95CI .64, .86 to b:.35; 95%CI .19, .52), pre-surgery history of falls (b:-.29; 95%CI-.44,-.13), fear of falling (b:-.55; 95%CI-.69,-.41 to b:-.32; 95%CI -.48, -.15), fear of movement (b:-.48; 95%CI-.63,-.33 to -.22; 95%CI -.40, -.03), coherence of condition (b:-.23; 95%CI -.41, -.05 to b:-.17; 95%CI-.33,-.01) and perceived personal control (b:.26; 95%CI .09, .43 to b:.14; 95%CI.02,.31), were significantly associated with pre-surgical walking (p < .05). Most pre-surgical variables were not longitudinally associated with change in walking post-surgery. Six-weeks post-surgery fear of falling (b:-.35; 95%CI -.57, -.13 to b:-.18; 95%CI-.33,-.02), fear of movement (b:-.32; 95%CI-.53,-.11 to b:-.19; 95%CI -.33, -.05), and emotional response (b-.24; 95%CI -.38, -.11 to b:-.22; 95%CI -.41, -.03) were significantly associated with less improvement in walking at 12-weeks post-surgery. Prehabilitation and post-operative rehabilitation targeting walking, balance, and psychosocial factors is recommended to optimise post-surgical walking.

Indexed as

Intermittent ClaudicationSpinal StenosisWalkingAccidental FallsAgedAged, 80 and overFearFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesFear of fallingFear of movementNeurogenic claudicationPrognosisRehabilitationWalking

Identifiers

PMID39929935
PMCPMC11811296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.