ArticleScientific reports2025
Disaster victim identification: the co-utilisation of applied biosystems RapidHIT ID system and DJI Matrice 300 drone for onsite DNA analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimization of DNA collection card workflows on the RapidHIT™ ID instrument.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Disaster Victim Identification (DVI) following mass fatality events is critical in bringing closure to the victims' family members and their loved ones. However, post-disaster environments are typically unfavourable and pose difficulties for the execution of DVI procedures. Delays in collecting, transporting, and processing the samples may cause DNA to degrade, adversely impacting the identification process. Therefore, this study aimed to demonstrate the co-utilisation of RapidHIT ID (RHID) and DJI Matrice 300 (M300) for onsite DNA analysis using buccal swab samples. 40 samples (two replicates) were collected from 20 "victims" and another 40 (two replicates) from 20 corresponding "relatives". The first replicates were processed using RHID (n = 40) and the second replicates were analysed via conventional technologies (n = 40). This paper observed the genotyping success rate, kinship matching, concordance, comparing different sample collectors, storage interval, and time taken for both procedures. Results of this study showed that RHID could generate DNA profiles for all the samples (n = 40) with 90% of them showing full profiles, and managed to process samples that have been stored for up to six months. The drone-assisted procedure exhibits less time to obtain and analyse the samples but can still produce DNA profiles concordant with the conventional method (p > 0.05). In conclusion, RHID is sufficient to generate interpretable DNA profiles in harsh environments, and transporting samples by M300 drone can reduce the exposure time to process more quality DNA for DVI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.