ArticleScientific reports2025
Decoupling chemical and mechanical signaling in colorectal cancer cell migration.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Homing and Migration of Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in Clinical Applications: Molecular Mechanisms, Translational Barriers, and Therapeutic Optimization.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Review
- A 3D model to evaluate cell chemotaxis within a heterogenic tumor microenvironment.Lab on a chip · 2026Article
- Computational models in directed cell migration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- The CXCL12-CXCR4 axis in colorectal cancer: immune regulation, metastatic progression, and therapeutic implications.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Colorectal cancer metastasis is governed by a variety of chemical and mechanical signaling that are largely influenced by cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in the tumor microenvironment. Here, we deconvolute the chemical from mechanical signaling in the case of the colon cancer cell line HCT-116 and CAFs. We examined three chemoattractants (CXCL12, TGF-β, and activin A) which allegedly are secreted by CAFs and induce HCT-116 cell migration. None of the chemoattractants tested resulted in enhanced migration of HCT-116 in a 2D transwell assay, at low cell density. Similarly, CAF-conditioned media also did not lead to enhanced HCT-116 migration, while CAFs co-cultured in the transwell assay did lead to increased HCT-116 migration. This result suggests that either high cell densities are required for chemotaxis, and/or a reciprocal two-way signaling network between CAFs and HCT-116 is necessary to induce chemotaxis. Surprisingly, we find that HCT-116 cells exhibit enhanced migration along the axis of mechanical stress in a 3D collagen matrix, at very high cell densities. This migration is independent of whether the strain is induced mechanically or by CAFs. By comparing purely mechanical and purely chemical migration to a 3D co-culture of CAFs and HCT-116 containing both chemical and mechanical cues, it is concluded that HCT-116 migration is dominated by mechanical signaling, while chemical cues are less influential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.