ArticleScientific reports2025
Nutrition regulates reproductive senescence and terminal investment across the reproductive cycle of a long-lived mammal.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The auxiliary effect of oral nutritional supplements on fertility in women with diminished ovarian reserve: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Maternal carryover drives post-weaning survival of juveniles in a long-lived mammal.Oecologia · 2026Article
- A multidisciplinary assessment of endocrine and morphometric correlates of lactation physiology in southern right whales.Conservation physiology · 2026Article
- Life-history trade-offs and environmental variability shape reproductive demography in a mountain ungulate.The Journal of animal ecology · 2025Article
- Maternal flexibility in Galápagos sea lions mitigates climate impacts but not population decline.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral EcologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deterioration in nutritional condition with aging could reduce reproductive success but coincides with declines in residual reproductive potential, thus invoking opposing expectations for late-life reproduction. Yet, the mechanisms regulating energy accrual and allocation to reproduction and survival throughout the lifetime of long-lived, iteroparous animals have remained elusive owing to variation in energetic costs across their extended reproductive cycle (from conception to juvenile independence). Using 10 years of repeated measures of both nutrition (i.e., body fat and food availability) and reproductive allocation across the reproductive cycle of 232 free-ranging, adult, female mule deer, we revealed that nutrition is a critical piece in understanding patterns of reproductive senescence and terminal investment. From conception to weaning, age-related patterns of reproduction were influenced by both body fat and environmental conditions. Reproductive senescence was clear across the entire reproductive cycle, although allocation to offspring was partly mediated by nutrition. Terminal investment, however, was most evident towards the end of the annual reproductive cycle and unveiled only when considering nutritional condition and food availability; during years with poor resource availability, older mothers raised larger juveniles (i.e., 6-months old). Our work evokes nutrition as a lurking variable in end-of-life reproductive tactics for long-lived animals, while demonstrating the necessity of accounting for energy when considering patterns of reproductive senescence and terminal investment in wild animals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.