ArticleScientific reports2025
Bioinformatics Analysis of coagulation-related genes in lung adenocarcinoma: unveiling prognostic indicators and treatment pathways.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of novel ceRNA networks associated with system hemostasis and their prognostic implication in lung squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Article
- Risk factor analysis and prediction of lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis after surgery in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Tumor-targeted Exosomal Delivery of Celastrol for Enhanced Therapeutic Efficacy in NSCLC.Theranostics · 2026Article
- Bioinformatics analysis identifies NT5M modulates immune evasion through PD-L1 via CXCL8 in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Exploring NUP62's role in cancer progression, tumor immunity, and treatment response: insights from multi-omics analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Multi-cohort validation based on coagulation-related genes for predicting prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) frequently precipitates a hypercoagulable state, resulting in venous thromboembolism and associated hemostatic complications. Furthermore, the coagulation cascade holds a pivotal role within the tumor microenvironment (TME) of LUAD. Utilizing unsupervised clustering of coagulation-related genes (CRG) and integrating clinical attributes, distinctions and correlations in clustering across various groups were assessed. Principal component analysis (PCA) was employed to derive the CRGscore for LUAD patients. Subsequently, a prognostic signature was established to contrast the impacts of immunological and pharmacological treatments across groups. The expression of PIK3CA, posited as a potential biomarker, was corroborated via immunohistochemistry(IHC) and Western blotting. This research delineated pronounced variances in immune signatures and prognostic categorizations among four coagulation-related subtypes, and delved into their associations with three gene cluster subtypes. A prognostic model based on coagulation-related scores was formulated for risk stratification and prognosis estimation. Disparities in immune infiltration, treatment modalities, and drug responsiveness among risk cohorts were discerned. Notably, an augmented expression of the coagulation-associated gene PIK3CA was observed in tumor samples. Coagulatory function is intimately linked with LUAD and its immune microenvironment, offering predictive potential for LUAD survival prognosis. Specifically, subgroups manifesting elevated PIK3CA expression might serve as foundational indicators for optimal treatment selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.