Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39929861›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Detecting glaucoma worsening using optical coherence tomography derived visual field estimates.

Alex T Pham, Chris Bradley, Kaihua Hou, Patrick Herbert, Jithin Yohannan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alex T PhamUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Chris BradleyWilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kaihua HouUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Patrick HerbertMalone Center for Engineering in Healthcare, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jithin YohannanWilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. jithin@jhmi.edu.

Funding

A Comprehensive Strategy to Detect Glaucoma Worsening Earlier and With Fewer TestsK23EY032204 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI YOHANNAN, JITHIN · 2021 to 2025
$956k
NEI NIH HHS K23 EY032204
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple glaucoma studies have attempted to generate visual field (VF) mean deviation (MD) estimates using cross-sectional optical coherence tomography (OCT) data. However, whether such models offer any value in detecting longitudinal VF progression is unclear. We address this by developing a machine learning (ML) model to convert OCT data to MD and assessing its ability to detect longitudinal worsening. In this study, we created a model dataset of 70,575 paired OCT/VFs to train an ML model to convert OCT to VF-MD. We created a separate progression dataset of 4,044 eyes with ≥ 5 paired OCT/VFs to assess the ability of OCT-derived MD to detect worsening. The progression dataset eyes had 2 additional unpaired VFs (≥ 7 total) to establish a "ground truth" rate of progression defined by MD slope. We used the ML model to generate longitudinal OCT-MD estimates for each OCT scan for progression dataset eyes. We calculated MD slopes after substituting/supplementing VF-MD with OCT-MD and measured the ability to detect progression. We labeled true progressors using a ground truth MD slope < 0.5 dB/year calculated from ≥ 7 VF-MD measurements. We compared the area under the curve (AUC) of MD slopes calculated using both VF-MD (with < 7 measurements) and OCT-MD. Because we found OCT-MD substitution had a statistically inferior AUC to VF-MD, we simulated the effect of reducing OCT-MD mean absolute error (MAE) on the ability to detect worsening. Our model's OCT-MD estimates had an MAE of 1.62 dB (better than that of any previously published models). However, we found the AUC of MD slopes with partial OCT-MD substitution was significantly worse than the VF-MD slope. Supplementing VF-MD with OCT-MD also did not improve AUC, regardless of MAE. We found that OCT-MD estimates needed an MAE ≤ 1.00 dB before AUC was statistically similar to VF-MD alone. Overall, our ML model converting OCT data to VF-MD had error levels lower than those published in prior work and was inferior to VF-MD data for detecting trend-based VF progression. Our data suggest that future models converting OCT data to VF-MD must achieve better prediction errors (MAE ≤ 1 dB) to be clinically valuable at detecting VF worsening.

Indexed as

GlaucomaTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual FieldsAgedDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedVisual Field Tests

Identifiers

PMID39929861
PMCPMC11811138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.