ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2025
Overall biomass yield on multiple nutrient sources.
Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thermodynamic Evaluation of Dual Substrate Growth.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2026Article
- Mineral-Targeted Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Investigating the production and synergistic antibacterial activity of bacteriocin-like substance fromHeliyon · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microorganisms primarily utilize nutrients to generate biomass and replicate. When a single nutrient source is available, the produced biomass typically increases linearly with the initial amount of that nutrient. This linear trend can be accurately predicted by "black box models", which conceptualize growth as a single chemical reaction, treating nutrients as substrates and biomass as a product. However, natural environments usually present multiple nutrient sources, prompting us to extend the black box framework to incorporate catabolism, anabolism, and biosynthesis of biomass precursors. This modification allows for the quantification of co-utilization effects among multiple nutrients on microbial biomass production. The extended model differentiates between different types of nutrients: non-degradable nutrients, which can only serve as a biomass precursor, and degradable nutrients, which can also be used as an energy source. We experimentally demonstrated using Escherichia coli that, in contrast to initial model predictions, different nutrients affect each other's utilization in a mutually dependent manner; i.e., for some combinations, the produced biomass was no longer proportional to the initial amounts of nutrients present. To account for these mutual effects within a black box framework, we phenomenologically introduced an interaction between the metabolic processes involved in utilizing the nutrient sources. This phenomenological model qualitatively captures the experimental observations and, unexpectedly, predicts that the total produced biomass is influenced not only by the combination of nutrient sources but also by their relative initial amounts - a prediction we subsequently validated experimentally. Moreover, the model identifies which metabolic processes - catabolism, anabolism, or precursor biosynthesis-is affected in each specific nutrient combination, offering insights into microbial metabolic coordination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.