Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39929747›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2025

Exploring the Interaction of RBD with Human β Defensin Type 2 Point Mutants: Insights from Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Ishrat Jahan, Liqun Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ishrat JahanChemical Engineering Department, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island 02881, United States.
Liqun ZhangChemical Engineering Department, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island 02881, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6933-4330

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global health crisis triggered by the SARS-CoV-2 virus has highlighted the urgent need for effective treatments. As existing drugs are not specifically targeted at this virus, there is a growing interest in exploring natural antimicrobial peptides such as defensin as potential therapeutic options. Human β defensin type 2 (hBD-2), which is a cationic cysteine-rich peptide, serves as the initial barrier against bacterial and fungal invaders in mammals. It can bind with Spike-RBD and occupy the same site as the ACE2 receptor, thereby hindering viral entry into cells expressing ACE2. To explore the effect of different point mutations on the binding of hBD-2 with RBD, the binding dynamics and interactions between hBD-2 point mutants with RBD were studied and compared with that of RBD&hBD-2 wild-type complex. In total, 247 hBD-2 point mutants were built with the mutation sites at the binding region of hBD-2 (RES18-30) with the RBD of CoV-2. All-atom molecular dynamics simulations were carried out on RBD binding with hBD-2 point mutants. Analysis based on root-mean-square deviation (RMSD), hydrogen bonds analysis, and binding free energy using the MM/PBSA method revealed that many point mutants of hBD-2 exhibit weaker binding with RBD compared to the wild type; however, a subset of mutants, including C20I, C20K, R22W, R23H, R23L, Y24L, K25F, K25H, G28Y, T29R, and C30K, displayed enhanced binding with RBD. The findings can offer insights designing hBD-2-based novel drugs to combat SARS-CoV-2 in the long term.

Indexed as

beta-DefensinsMolecular Dynamics SimulationPoint MutationSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusBinding SitesHumansProtein BindingSARS-CoV-2beta-DefensinsDEFB4A protein, humanSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID39929747
PMCPMC12422537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.