Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39929724›Full record

ArticleGenome research2025

Variation in the fitness impact of translationally optimal codons among animals.

Florian Bénitière, Tristan Lefébure, Laurent Duret

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Genes near tRNAs are enriched in translational machinery.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Impact of GC content on de novo gene birth.Nature communications · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Sex-biased duplicates are rapidly generated duringbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Macroevolutionary changes in natural selection on codon usage reflect evolution of the tRNA pool across a budding yeast subphylum.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Florian BénitièreLaboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Évolutive, Université Lyon 1, UMR CNRS 5558, Villeurbanne, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7773-3542
Tristan LefébureUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, LEHNA UMR 5023, CNRS, ENTPE, F-69622, Villeurbanne, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3923-8166
Laurent DuretLaboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Évolutive, Université Lyon 1, UMR CNRS 5558, Villeurbanne, France; laurent.duret@univ-lyon1.fr.ORCID 0000-0003-2836-3463

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early studies in invertebrate model organisms (fruit flies, nematodes) showed that their synonymous codon usage is under selective pressure to optimize translation efficiency in highly expressed genes (a process called translational selection). In contrast, mammals show little evidence of selection for translationally optimal codons. To understand this difference, we examined the use of synonymous codons in 223 metazoan species, covering a wide range of animal clades. For each species, we predicted the set of optimal codons based on the pool of tRNA genes present in its genome, and we analyzed how the frequency of optimal codons correlates with gene expression to quantify the intensity of translational selection (

Indexed as

CodonCodon UsageGenetic FitnessProtein BiosynthesisAnimalsEvolution, MolecularRNA, TransferSelection, GeneticCodonRNA, Transfer

Identifiers

PMID39929724
PMCPMC11960461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.