ArticleRMD open2025
How to build a framework to establish a patient research partner network in rheumatology research: a report of a 2-year implementation project.
Article in RMD open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Building the future of patient-centred research: an EULAR PARE community of practice advancing patient research partner involvement in rheumatology.EULAR rheumatology open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient research partners (PRPs) are people living with a relevant disease who actively contribute to research. Their contribution is beneficial for any research project. Although the inclusion of PRPs in rheumatology research is increasingly recommended, its practical implementation, particularly in translational research, remains limited . Enhancing PRP engagement requires a clear understanding of the necessary steps.
objectiveThis study aims to show steps to achieve successful collaboration between PRPs and researchers in clinical and transitional research in rheumatology.
methodsWe established a PRP network by following five main steps: setting up infrastructure, recruitment, training, PRP involvement at an early stage, and ongoing support. We adhered to overall principles of openness, feedback, and regular evaluations to create a respectful and collaborative environment. The initiative was qualitatively assessed via an online questionnaire developed by each six researchers and PRPs.
resultsCommunicating our initiative at laboratory open days and to patient associations has enabled to create a network of 66 PRPs. A match-making tool was introduced to allocate interested PRPs with a project request. This led to PRP involvement in 15 projects, including 9 in translational research. Two PRP-coordinators provided support including glossaries and educational courses .
conclusionOur initiative outlines five essential steps for establishing PRP collaboration in rheumatology research, including translational research. This approach benefited both PRPs and researchers and might serve as a guide for other centres.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.