ArticleBMJ open2025
Protocol of the
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping the type, frequency, intensity, temporality, and pathways of dissemination strategies during the national scale-up of TransformUs Secondary.Translational behavioral medicine · 2026Trial
- Dissemination strategies for the national scale-up of a school-based physical activity initiative: insights from education and health sector partner organizations.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Associations between physical activity and sedentary time with sleep duration and sleep quality in adolescents.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Associations between 24-hour movement behaviours and psychological wellbeing in adolescents using compositional data analysis.Journal of activity, sedentary and sleep behaviors · 2025Article
- Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour, and Screen Time Amongst Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Australian Children and Adolescents: A Scoping Review of Quantitative and Qualitative Studies.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDespite the known health and educational benefits of physical activity and the risks of prolonged sedentary behaviour, only one in 10 adolescents globally meet physical activity guidelines, and three-quarters of the school day is spent sitting. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A type II hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial will be conducted using a mixed-methods design. For the implementation trial, ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: These trials were approved by the Deakin University Human Research Ethics Committee (2021-269) and by the following education authorities: Australian Capital Territory Education Directorate (RES 2317), New South Wales Department of Education (2022253), Northern Territory Department of Education (20865), Victoria Department of Education (2023_004712), Queensland Department of Education (550/27/2585), South Australian Department of Education (2022-0019), Tasmanian Department of Education (2022-25), Western Australian Department of Education (D23/1152724), and Melbourne Archdiocese Catholic Schools (1232). Results from this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal articles, scientific conferences, summary reports to students and schools and stakeholder meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian Clinical Trials Registration Registry (ACTRN12622000600741).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.