Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39929140›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2025

Automated Analysis of Soft Matter Interfaces, Interactions, and Self-Assembly with PySoftK.

Raquel López-Ríos de Castro, Alejandro Santana-Bonilla, Robert M Ziolek, Christian D Lorenz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Raquel López-Ríos de CastroDepartment of Chemistry, King's College London, London SE1 1DB, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2668-7405
Alejandro Santana-BonillaDepartment of Physics, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom.
Robert M ZiolekBiological Physics and Soft Matter Group, Department of Physics, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4011-9658
Christian D LorenzBiological Physics and Soft Matter Group, Department of Physics, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1028-4804

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular dynamics simulations have become essential tools in the study of soft matter and biological macromolecules. The large amount of high-dimensional data associated with such simulations does not straightforwardly elucidate the atomistic mechanisms that underlie complex materials and molecular processes. Analysis of these simulations is complicated: the dynamics intrinsic to soft matter simulations necessitates careful application of specific, and often complex, algorithms to extract meaningful molecular scale understanding. There is an ongoing need for high-quality automated computational workflows to facilitate this analysis in a reproducible manner with minimal user input. In this work, we introduce a series of molecular simulation analysis tools for investigating interfaces, molecular interactions (including ring-ring stacking), and self-assembly. In addition, we include a number of auxiliary tools, including a useful function to unwrap molecular structures that are greater than half the length of their corresponding simulation box. These tools are contained in the PySoftK software package, making the application of these algorithms straightforward for the user. These new simulation analysis tools within PySoftK will support high-quality, reproducible analysis of soft matter and biomolecular simulations to bring about new predictive understanding in nano- and biotechnology.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationSoftwareAlgorithmsAutomation

Identifiers

PMID39929140
PMCPMC11863363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.